From: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
To: peterx@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Prasad Pandit <ppandit@redhat.com>,
peterx@redhat.com, Bandan Das <bdas@redhat.com>,
Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] migration: Drop unnecessary check in ram's pending_exact()
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 10:25:55 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mst1zc7w.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240117075848.139045-3-peterx@redhat.com>
peterx@redhat.com writes:
> From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
>
> When the migration frameworks fetches the exact pending sizes, it means
> this check:
>
> remaining_size < s->threshold_size
>
> Must have been done already, actually at migration_iteration_run():
>
> if (must_precopy <= s->threshold_size) {
> qemu_savevm_state_pending_exact(&must_precopy, &can_postcopy);
>
> That should be after one round of ram_state_pending_estimate(). It makes
> the 2nd check meaningless and can be dropped.
>
> To say it in another way, when reaching ->state_pending_exact(), we
> unconditionally sync dirty bits for precopy.
>
> Then we can drop migrate_get_current() there too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-19 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-17 7:58 [PATCH 0/3] migration: some small cleanups peterx
2024-01-17 7:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] migration: Make threshold_size an uint64_t peterx
2024-01-17 8:09 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-01-19 13:26 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-01-17 7:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] migration: Drop unnecessary check in ram's pending_exact() peterx
2024-01-19 13:25 ` Fabiano Rosas [this message]
2024-03-20 17:51 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-03-20 18:05 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-03-20 18:57 ` Peter Xu
2024-03-20 19:21 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-03-20 19:46 ` Peter Xu
2024-03-20 20:45 ` Peter Xu
2024-01-17 7:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] analyze-migration.py: Remove trick on parsing ramblocks peterx
2024-01-19 13:23 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-01-20 2:36 ` [PATCH 0/3] migration: some small cleanups Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mst1zc7w.fsf@suse.de \
--to=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=bdas@redhat.com \
--cc=jusual@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).