From: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/13] migration: Fix parameter validation
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 14:39:48 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o6vk5yu3.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r00g61n5.fsf@suse.de>
Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> writes:
> Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 04:14:34PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>>> The migration parameters validation involves producing a temporary
>>> structure which merges the current parameter values with the new
>>> parameters set by the user.
>>>
>>> The has_ boolean fields of MigrateSetParameter are taken into
>>> consideration when writing the temporary structure, however the copy
>>> of the current parameters also copies all the has_ fields of
>>> s->parameters and those are (almost) all true due to being initialized
>>> by migrate_params_init().
>>>
>>> Since the temporary structure copy does not carry over the has_ fields
>>> from MigrateSetParameters, only the values which were initialized in
>>> migrate_params_init() will end up being validated. This causes
>>> (almost) all of the migration parameters to be validated again every
>>> time a parameter is set, which could be considered a bug. But it also
>>> skips validation of those values which are not set in
>>> migrate_params_init(), which is a worse issue.
>>
>> IMHO it's ok to double check all parameters in slow path. Definitely not
>> ok to skip them.. So now the question is, if migrate_params_test_apply() so
>> far should check all params anyway...
Actually, this doesn't work...
The migrate-set-* commands have optional fields, so we need some form of
checking has_* to know which fields the user is setting. Otherwise
MigrationSetParameters will have zeros all over that will trip the
check.
Then, we need some form of checking has_* to be able to enventually get
the values into s->config (former s->parameters/capabilities), otherwise
we'll overwrite the already-set values with the potentially empty ones
coming from QAPI.
Then there's also the issue of knowing whether a value is 0 because the
user set it 0 or because it was never set.
We also can't apply an invalid value to s->config and validate it after
because some parameters are allowed to be changed during migration.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-22 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-11 19:14 [RFC PATCH 00/13] migration: Unify capabilities and parameters Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 01/13] migration: Fix latent bug in migrate_params_test_apply() Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 02/13] migration: Normalize tls arguments Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-14 16:30 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 03/13] migration: Run a post update routine after setting parameters Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-15 20:42 ` Peter Xu
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 04/13] migration: Fix parameter validation Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-15 20:59 ` Peter Xu
2025-05-22 16:39 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-22 17:39 ` Fabiano Rosas [this message]
2025-05-26 13:09 ` Peter Xu
2025-05-26 15:41 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 05/13] migration: Reduce a bit of duplication in migration.json Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-14 16:38 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-14 17:02 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-16 13:38 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-16 14:41 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-17 5:56 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-17 18:45 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-18 6:40 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 06/13] migration: Remove the parameters copy during validation Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 07/13] migration: Introduce new MigrationConfig structure Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-18 7:03 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-23 13:38 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-26 7:37 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 08/13] migration: Replace s->parameters with s->config Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 09/13] migration: Do away with usage of QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 10/13] migration: Replace s->capabilities with s->config Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 11/13] migration: Merge parameters and capability checks Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 12/13] [PoC] migration: Add query/set commands for MigrationConfig Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-26 7:51 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-27 22:14 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 13/13] [PoC] migration: Allow migrate commands to provide the migration config Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-26 8:03 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-26 15:10 ` Peter Xu
2025-04-14 16:44 ` [RFC PATCH 00/13] migration: Unify capabilities and parameters Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-14 17:12 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-14 17:20 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-14 17:40 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-14 19:06 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-15 20:21 ` Peter Xu
2025-04-16 13:44 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-16 15:00 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-24 9:35 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o6vk5yu3.fsf@suse.de \
--to=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).