qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/13] migration: Fix parameter validation
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 14:39:48 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o6vk5yu3.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r00g61n5.fsf@suse.de>

Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> writes:

> Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 04:14:34PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>>> The migration parameters validation involves producing a temporary
>>> structure which merges the current parameter values with the new
>>> parameters set by the user.
>>> 
>>> The has_ boolean fields of MigrateSetParameter are taken into
>>> consideration when writing the temporary structure, however the copy
>>> of the current parameters also copies all the has_ fields of
>>> s->parameters and those are (almost) all true due to being initialized
>>> by migrate_params_init().
>>> 
>>> Since the temporary structure copy does not carry over the has_ fields
>>> from MigrateSetParameters, only the values which were initialized in
>>> migrate_params_init() will end up being validated. This causes
>>> (almost) all of the migration parameters to be validated again every
>>> time a parameter is set, which could be considered a bug. But it also
>>> skips validation of those values which are not set in
>>> migrate_params_init(), which is a worse issue.
>>
>> IMHO it's ok to double check all parameters in slow path.  Definitely not
>> ok to skip them.. So now the question is, if migrate_params_test_apply() so
>> far should check all params anyway...

Actually, this doesn't work...

The migrate-set-* commands have optional fields, so we need some form of
checking has_* to know which fields the user is setting. Otherwise
MigrationSetParameters will have zeros all over that will trip the
check.

Then, we need some form of checking has_* to be able to enventually get
the values into s->config (former s->parameters/capabilities), otherwise
we'll overwrite the already-set values with the potentially empty ones
coming from QAPI.

Then there's also the issue of knowing whether a value is 0 because the
user set it 0 or because it was never set.

We also can't apply an invalid value to s->config and validate it after
because some parameters are allowed to be changed during migration.



  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-22 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-11 19:14 [RFC PATCH 00/13] migration: Unify capabilities and parameters Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 01/13] migration: Fix latent bug in migrate_params_test_apply() Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 02/13] migration: Normalize tls arguments Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-14 16:30   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 03/13] migration: Run a post update routine after setting parameters Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-15 20:42   ` Peter Xu
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 04/13] migration: Fix parameter validation Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-15 20:59   ` Peter Xu
2025-05-22 16:39     ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-22 17:39       ` Fabiano Rosas [this message]
2025-05-26 13:09         ` Peter Xu
2025-05-26 15:41           ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 05/13] migration: Reduce a bit of duplication in migration.json Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-14 16:38   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-14 17:02     ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-16 13:38       ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-16 14:41         ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-17  5:56           ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-17 18:45   ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-18  6:40     ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 06/13] migration: Remove the parameters copy during validation Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 07/13] migration: Introduce new MigrationConfig structure Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-18  7:03   ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-23 13:38     ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-26  7:37       ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 08/13] migration: Replace s->parameters with s->config Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 09/13] migration: Do away with usage of QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 10/13] migration: Replace s->capabilities with s->config Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 11/13] migration: Merge parameters and capability checks Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 12/13] [PoC] migration: Add query/set commands for MigrationConfig Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-26  7:51   ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-27 22:14     ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 13/13] [PoC] migration: Allow migrate commands to provide the migration config Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-26  8:03   ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-26 15:10     ` Peter Xu
2025-04-14 16:44 ` [RFC PATCH 00/13] migration: Unify capabilities and parameters Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-14 17:12   ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-14 17:20     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-14 17:40       ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-14 19:06         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-15 20:21         ` Peter Xu
2025-04-16 13:44   ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-16 15:00     ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-24  9:35       ` Markus Armbruster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87o6vk5yu3.fsf@suse.de \
    --to=farosas@suse.de \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).