From: Sergio Lopez <slp@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com,
lersek@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
kraxel@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com, philmd@redhat.com,
rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] docs/microvm.txt: document the new microvm machine type
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:23:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o8z737am.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d70d3812-fd84-b248-7965-cae15704e785@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2820 bytes --]
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
> On 25/09/19 17:04, Sergio Lopez wrote:
>> I'm going back to this level of the thread, because after your
>> suggestion I took a deeper look at how things work around the PIC, and
>> discovered I was completely wrong about my assumptions.
>>
>> For virtio-mmio devices, given that we don't have the ability to
>> configure vectors (as it's done in the PCI case) we're stuck with the
>> ones provided by the platform PIC, which in the x86 case is the i8259
>> (at least from Linux's perspective).
>>
>> So we can get rid of the IOAPIC, but we need to keep the i8259 (we have
>> both a userspace and a kernel implementation too, so it should be fine).
>
> Hmm... I would have thought the vectors are just GSIs, which will be
> configured to the IOAPIC if it is present. Maybe something is causing
> Linux to ignore the IOAPIC?
Turns out it was a bug in microvm. I was writing 0 to FW_CFG_NB_CPUS
(because I was using x86ms->boot_cpus instead of ms->smp.cpus), which
led to a broken MP table, causing Linux to ignore it and, as a side
effect to disable IOAPIC symmetric I/O mode.
After fixing it we can, indeed, boot without the i8259 \o/ :
/ # dmesg | grep legacy
[ 0.074144] Using NULL legacy PIC
/ # cat /pr[ 12.116930] random: fast init done
/ # cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1
4: 0 278 IO-APIC 4-edge ttyS0
12: 48 0 IO-APIC 12-edge virtio0
NMI: 0 0 Non-maskable interrupts
LOC: 124 98 Local timer interrupts
SPU: 0 0 Spurious interrupts
PMI: 0 0 Performance monitoring interrupts
IWI: 0 0 IRQ work interrupts
RTR: 0 0 APIC ICR read retries
RES: 476 535 Rescheduling interrupts
CAL: 0 76 Function call interrupts
TLB: 0 0 TLB shootdowns
HYP: 0 0 Hypervisor callback interrupts
ERR: 0
MIS: 0
PIN: 0 0 Posted-interrupt notification event
NPI: 0 0 Nested posted-interrupt event
PIW: 0 0 Posted-interrupt wakeup event
There's still one problem. If the Guest doesn't have TSC_DEADLINE_TIME,
Linux hangs on APIC timer calibration. I'm looking for a way to work
around this. Worst case scenario, we can check for that feature and add
both PIC and PIT if is missing.
>> As for the PIT, we can omit it if we're running with KVM acceleration,
>> as kvmclock will be used to calculate loops per jiffie and avoid the
>> calibration, leaving it enabled otherwise.
>
> Can you make it an OnOffAuto property, and default to on iff !KVM?
Sure.
Thanks,
Sergio.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-26 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-24 12:44 [PATCH v4 0/8] Introduce the microvm machine type Sergio Lopez
2019-09-24 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] hw/i386: Factorize PVH related functions Sergio Lopez
2019-09-24 13:18 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-09-25 6:03 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-09-25 8:36 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-09-25 9:00 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-09-25 9:29 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-09-24 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] hw/i386: Factorize e820 " Sergio Lopez
2019-09-24 13:20 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-09-24 14:12 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-09-24 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] hw/virtio: Factorize virtio-mmio headers Sergio Lopez
2019-09-24 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] hw/i386: split PCMachineState deriving X86MachineState from it Sergio Lopez
2019-09-24 13:40 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-09-25 15:39 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-09-24 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] fw_cfg: add "modify" functions for all types Sergio Lopez
2019-09-24 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] roms: add microvm-bios (qboot) as binary and git submodule Sergio Lopez
2019-09-24 13:31 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-09-25 6:09 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-09-24 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] docs/microvm.txt: document the new microvm machine type Sergio Lopez
2019-09-24 13:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-25 5:49 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-09-25 7:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-25 8:40 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-09-25 9:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-25 11:04 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-09-25 11:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-25 15:04 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-09-25 16:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-26 6:23 ` Sergio Lopez [this message]
2019-09-26 8:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-26 10:16 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-09-26 10:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-26 12:12 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-09-25 5:06 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2019-09-25 7:33 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-09-25 8:51 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2019-09-24 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] hw/i386: Introduce the " Sergio Lopez
2019-09-24 13:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-24 13:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-09-24 13:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-25 5:53 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-09-24 13:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-09-25 5:59 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-10-01 8:56 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-09-25 15:40 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-09-26 6:34 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-09-26 8:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-24 13:57 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] " Peter Maydell
2019-09-25 5:51 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-09-25 11:33 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-09-25 12:39 ` Peter Maydell
2019-09-25 7:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 7:58 ` Pankaj Gupta
2019-09-25 8:10 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-09-25 8:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 8:37 ` Pankaj Gupta
2019-09-25 8:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-25 8:42 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-09-25 8:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 10:19 ` when to use virtio (was Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Introduce the microvm machine type) Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-25 10:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 11:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-25 11:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 9:12 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] Introduce the microvm machine type Gerd Hoffmann
2019-09-25 9:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-25 9:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-26 7:48 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-09-26 8:22 ` Sergio Lopez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o8z737am.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=slp@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).