From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35132) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vlkrf-0002ca-Nz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:33:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VlkrY-0006M9-EH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:33:35 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-f178.google.com ([209.85.192.178]:61921) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VlkrY-0006M1-8N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:33:28 -0500 Received: by mail-pd0-f178.google.com with SMTP id y10so10526232pdj.37 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:33:27 -0800 (PST) From: Anthony Liguori In-Reply-To: <20131127094219.GA2884@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com> References: <1385407736-13941-1-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com> <87vbzfrqhw.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <20131127094219.GA2884@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:33:23 -0800 Message-ID: <87ob55fxmk.fsf@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-1.7 0/2] block/drive-mirror: Reuse backing HD for sync=none List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi , Max Reitz Kevin Wolf writes: > Am 26.11.2013 um 19:02 hat Anthony Liguori geschrieben: >> Max Reitz writes: >> >> > This series fixes the drive-mirror blockjob in case of "none" sync mode >> > to always use the old (current) image file as the backing file of the >> > newly created mirrored file (in case of "absolute-paths" mode). >> > >> > It is rather important to get this into 1.7, as we will introduce an at >> > least pretty strange API in case the original file is unbacked >> > otherwise. >> >> Kevin/Stefan? Do we need this for 1.7? > > Yes, it would be good to pick it up in order to avoid changing the API > in 1.8 (I guess we would do it anyway because the current behaviour > doesn't make any sense and we'd call it bug fix, but libvirt would have > to deal with it and better to do it right in the first release.) > > Do you want to pick it up yourself or should I send a pull request? I'll pick it up. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf > > Kevin