From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44947) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UtdbQ-0006l2-Nb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 08:53:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UtdbO-0005hc-Am for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 08:53:08 -0400 Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.137]:52238) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UtdbO-0005gX-6J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 08:53:06 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e7.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 08:53:04 -0400 From: Anthony Liguori In-Reply-To: <874ncezl0l.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> References: <1372342930-28684-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <1372342930-28684-5-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <51CD9188.8060203@redhat.com> <874nci40gk.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <20130701030856.GD1946@amosk.info> <87a9m6bszj.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <20130701090020.GC20061@amosk.info> <874ncezl0l.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 07:52:27 -0500 Message-ID: <87obam4f3o.fsf@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] qapi: Rename ChardevBackend member "memory" to "ringbuf" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster , Amos Kong Cc: lilei@linux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-stable@nongnu.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com Markus Armbruster writes: > Amos Kong writes: > >> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:10:40AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>> Amos Kong writes: >>> >> The comment line in your patch doen't start with '#', it starts with >> blank-space. If we want qapi.py to process it, we need to do strip() >> first. > > Aha. I agree with your reading of parse_schema(). However, I get > exactly identical generated files with and without this comment. > > Michael, Anthony, can you explain why? > > Any particular reason for requiring comments to start in column 0? I don't remember a particular reason. Most likely an evolutionary artifact. Regards, Anthony Liguori