From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Manos Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidianakis@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Junjie Mao" <junjie.mao@hotmail.com>,
"Junjie Mao" <junjie.mao@intel.com>,
"Zhao Liu" <zhao1.liu@intel.com>, "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Gustavo Romero" <gustavo.romero@linaro.org>,
"Pierrick Bouvier" <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] rust/qemu-api-macros: introduce Device proc macro
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:13:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87plnpile2.fsf@draig.linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241024-rust-round-2-v1-3-051e7a25b978@linaro.org> (Manos Pitsidianakis's message of "Thu, 24 Oct 2024 17:03:01 +0300")
Manos Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidianakis@linaro.org> writes:
> Add a new derive procedural macro to declare device models. Add
> corresponding DeviceImpl trait after already existing ObjectImpl trait.
> At the same time, add instance_init, instance_post_init,
> instance_finalize methods to the ObjectImpl trait and call them from the
> ObjectImplUnsafe trait, which is generated by the procedural macro.
>
> This allows all the boilerplate device model registration to be handled
> by macros, and all pertinent details to be declared through proc macro
> attributes or trait associated constants and methods.
>
> The device class can now be generated automatically and the name can be
> optionally overridden:
>
> ------------------------ >8 ------------------------
> #[repr(C)]
> #[derive(Debug, qemu_api_macros::Object, qemu_api_macros::Device)]
> #[device(class_name_override = PL011Class)]
> /// PL011 Device Model in QEMU
> pub struct PL011State {
> ------------------------ >8 ------------------------
>
> Properties are now marked as field attributes:
>
> ------------------------ >8 ------------------------
> #[property(name = c"chardev", qdev_prop = qdev_prop_chr)]
> pub char_backend: CharBackend,
> ------------------------ >8 ------------------------
>
> Object methods (instance_init, etc) methods are now trait methods:
>
> ------------------------ >8 ------------------------
> /// Trait a type must implement to be registered with QEMU.
> pub trait ObjectImpl {
> type Class: ClassImpl;
> const TYPE_NAME: &'static CStr;
> const PARENT_TYPE_NAME: Option<&'static CStr>;
> const ABSTRACT: bool;
>
> unsafe fn instance_init(&mut self) {}
> fn instance_post_init(&mut self) {}
> fn instance_finalize(&mut self) {}
> }
> ------------------------ >8 ------------------------
>
> Device methods (realize/reset etc) are now safe idiomatic trait methods:
>
> ------------------------ >8 ------------------------
> /// Implementation methods for device types.
> pub trait DeviceImpl: ObjectImpl {
> fn realize(&mut self) {}
> fn reset(&mut self) {}
> }
> ------------------------ >8 ------------------------
>
> The derive Device macro is responsible for creating all the extern "C" FFI
> functions that QEMU needs to call these methods.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manos Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidianakis@linaro.org>
> ---
> rust/hw/char/pl011/src/device.rs | 124 +++-----
> rust/hw/char/pl011/src/device_class.rs | 70 -----
> rust/hw/char/pl011/src/lib.rs | 1 -
> rust/qemu-api-macros/src/device.rs | 433 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> rust/qemu-api-macros/src/lib.rs | 45 +--
> rust/qemu-api-macros/src/object.rs | 107 +++++++
> rust/qemu-api-macros/src/symbols.rs | 55 ++++
> rust/qemu-api-macros/src/utilities.rs | 152 +++++++++
> rust/qemu-api/meson.build | 3 +-
> rust/qemu-api/src/definitions.rs | 97 ------
> rust/qemu-api/src/device_class.rs | 128 --------
> rust/qemu-api/src/lib.rs | 6 +-
> rust/qemu-api/src/objects.rs | 90 ++++++
> rust/qemu-api/src/tests.rs | 49 ---
> subprojects/packagefiles/syn-2-rs/meson.build | 1 +
> 15 files changed, 902 insertions(+), 459 deletions(-)
My initial reaction is these patches are getting quite large because we
are doing several things at once. Is it possible to split them so:
- we bring in one macro at a time (with unit tests)
- we then convert pl011 to the new idiom
?
--
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-24 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-24 14:02 [PATCH 00/11] Rust device model patches and misc cleanups Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-10-24 14:02 ` [PATCH 01/11] Revert "rust: add PL011 device model" Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-10-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 02/11] rust: add PL011 device model Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-10-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 03/11] rust/qemu-api-macros: introduce Device proc macro Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-10-24 15:13 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2024-10-24 17:06 ` Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-10-25 12:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-10-25 14:04 ` Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-10-25 15:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-10-25 16:22 ` Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-10-27 20:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-10-27 22:39 ` Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-10-28 7:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-10-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 04/11] rust: add support for migration in device models Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-10-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 05/11] rust/pl011: move CLK_NAME static to function scope Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-10-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 06/11] rust/pl011: add TYPE_PL011_LUMINARY device Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-10-24 17:27 ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 07/11] rust/pl011: move pub callback decl to local scope Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-10-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 08/11] rust/pl011: remove commented out C code Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-10-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 09/11] rust/pl011: Use correct masks for IBRD and FBRD Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-10-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 10/11] rust/qemu-api: add log module Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-10-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 11/11] rust/pl011: log guest/unimp errors Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-10-25 9:33 ` [PATCH 00/11] Rust device model patches and misc cleanups Paolo Bonzini
2024-10-26 10:06 ` Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-10-27 8:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87plnpile2.fsf@draig.linaro.org \
--to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=gustavo.romero@linaro.org \
--cc=junjie.mao@hotmail.com \
--cc=junjie.mao@intel.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=manos.pitsidianakis@linaro.org \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).