Call for agenda for 2023-09-19 QEMU developers call

Call for agenda for 2023-09-19 QEMU developers call

[Juan Quintela]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 69 bytes --]

Hi

If you have any topics, please add to this email.

Thanks, Juan.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 183 bytes --]

Re: Call for agenda for 2023-09-19 QEMU developers call

[Juan Quintela]

Juan Quintela <juan.quintela@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> If you have any topics, please add to this email.

You can also update here if you preffer:

https://wiki.qemu.org/QEMUCall#Call_for_agenda_for_2023-09-19

Later, Juan.

> Thanks, Juan.

Re: Call for agenda for 2023-09-19 QEMU developers call

[Mark Burton]

Seems like we’ve had a bit of a ’slower’ time in recent weeks - presumably “summer time” - If I understand correctly, Linaro are not going toe preset this week?
Maybe we should re-group in the next meeting, 

So I’m happy to have the meeting tomorrow if Linaro can make it, otherwise for 3rd Oct, I have:
	I’d like to know where we are with the “Single Binary” work.
	I think there is still outstanding questions on the whole “startup” subject (related, but not the same)
	Alex and I have talked about the plugin-API to cover ‘icount’ use cases, and that seems to be nudging open a pandora’s box, so I think we should discuss that?


Cheers
Mark.


> On 15 Sep 2023, at 13:09, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.
> 
> Juan Quintela <juan.quintela@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>> 
>> If you have any topics, please add to this email.
> 
> You can also update here if you preffer:
> 
> https://wiki.qemu.org/QEMUCall#Call_for_agenda_for_2023-09-19
> 
> Later, Juan.
> 
>> Thanks, Juan.
> 

Re: Call for agenda for 2023-09-19 QEMU developers call

[Elena Ufimtseva]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2097 bytes --]

Hello Juan,

Not sure if this is worth its own topic, would be it possible to hear the community thoughts on the live migration series review/pull progress (atomics, zero page multifd etc.. )? Seems like there are few outstanding relevant patches.


Thank you!
________________________________
From: Juan Quintela <juan.quintela@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2023 1:45 AM
To: f4bug@amsat.org <f4bug@amsat.org>; Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>; Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>; mdean@redhat.com <mdean@redhat.com>; felipe@nutanix.com <felipe@nutanix.com>; afaerber@suse.de <afaerber@suse.de>; bazulay@redhat.com <bazulay@redhat.com>; bbauman@redhat.com <bbauman@redhat.com>; cw@f00f.org <cw@f00f.org>; dustin.kirkland@canonical.com <dustin.kirkland@canonical.com>; eblake@redhat.com <eblake@redhat.com>; edgar.iglesias@gmail.com <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>; eric.auger@redhat.com <eric.auger@redhat.com>; iggy@theiggy.com <iggy@theiggy.com>; jan.kiszka@web.de <jan.kiszka@web.de>; jidong.xiao@gmail.com <jidong.xiao@gmail.com>; jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; peter.maydell@linaro.org <peter.maydell@linaro.org>; richard.henderson@linaro.org <richard.henderson@linaro.org>; stefanha@gmail.com <stefanha@gmail.com>; imp@bsdimp.com <imp@bsdimp.com>; z.huo@139.com <z.huo@139.com>; zwu.kernel@gmail.com <zwu.kernel@gmail.com>; jgg@nvidia.com <jgg@nvidia.com>; cjia@nvidia.com <cjia@nvidia.com>; David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>; Elena Ufimtseva <elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com>; Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>; Alessandro Di Federico <ale@rev.ng>; anjo@rev.ng <anjo@rev.ng>; shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>; wei.w.wang@intel.com <wei.w.wang@intel.com>; chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mark Burton <mburton@qti.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Call for agenda for 2023-09-19 QEMU developers call

Hi

If you have any topics, please add to this email.

Thanks, Juan.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3759 bytes --]

Re: Call for agenda for 2023-09-19 QEMU developers call

[Juan Quintela]

Mark Burton <mburton@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> Seems like we’ve had a bit of a ’slower’ time in recent weeks -
> presumably “summer time” - If I understand correctly, Linaro are not
> going toe preset this week?
> Maybe we should re-group in the next meeting, 
>
> So I’m happy to have the meeting tomorrow if Linaro can make it, otherwise for 3rd Oct, I have:
> 	I’d like to know where we are with the “Single Binary” work.
> 	I think there is still outstanding questions on the whole
> “startup” subject (related, but not the same)
> 	Alex and I have talked about the plugin-API to cover ‘icount’
> use cases, and that seems to be nudging open a pandora’s box, so I
> think we should discuss that?

As nobody else answered this, I guess we are not having this in the call
for this week.

Move it to next call.

Thanks, Juan.

Re: Call for agenda for 2023-09-19 QEMU developers call

[Juan Quintela]

Elena Ufimtseva <elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com> wrote:
> Hello Juan,
>
> Not sure if this is worth its own topic, would be it possible to hear
> the community thoughts on the live migration series review/pull
> progress (atomics, zero page multifd etc.. )? Seems like there are few
> outstanding relevant patches.

Hi

If everybody agrees, can we move this topic to next call?
I am on vacation this week and the next.

I was planning time to "moderate" the call, but preparing for a call
about my topics is going to mean a divorce O:-)

Later, Juan.

PD.  I have had too many problem in the recent past with several things,
     from my test machines to disappear (and configuring new ones taking
     forever), to very bad time with the BOTS.  I expect/hope that
     things are gonig to get better in the near future.

Re: Call for agenda for 2023-09-19 QEMU developers call

[Elena Ufimtseva]

On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 02:02:49AM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Elena Ufimtseva <elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com> wrote:
> > Hello Juan,
> >
> > Not sure if this is worth its own topic, would be it possible to hear
> > the community thoughts on the live migration series review/pull
> > progress (atomics, zero page multifd etc.. )? Seems like there are few
> > outstanding relevant patches.
> 
> Hi
> 
> If everybody agrees, can we move this topic to next call?
> I am on vacation this week and the next.
> 
> I was planning time to "moderate" the call, but preparing for a call
> about my topics is going to mean a divorce O:-)
> 

Thank you Juan! Understood :)

> Later, Juan.
> 
> PD.  I have had too many problem in the recent past with several things,
>      from my test machines to disappear (and configuring new ones taking
>      forever), to very bad time with the BOTS.  I expect/hope that
>      things are gonig to get better in the near future.