From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28F47EB64DD for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 20:38:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qC4aQ-0000NP-RI; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 16:37:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qC4aB-0008VD-I2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 16:37:41 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qC4a7-0000pV-W4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 16:37:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1687379854; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=SGNt4e9laK8CgTGZPReueyCRkWN+R0nF15NkRMjE5v8=; b=GNrS7kMW76Xt5TBZ/9EjXxeQyedB3ld3PmX1LAbsZ8dQnVIcjw8M/Ek+l2NNyo4eyZc6AO yRCbzUK+eFbHz4AE1HlRQGa5eDADW0zj4cW//t0lwDd3raAdr1QukE7qMz+hnIqfUXDiLB Jc5H7tW2g5cRww8Kpuc/cPWzilY3fWg= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-558-3aNMqSOUPDCiK0PeNkrPlA-1; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 16:37:32 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 3aNMqSOUPDCiK0PeNkrPlA-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3f7e7cfcae4so34677555e9.1 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 13:37:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687379850; x=1689971850; h=mime-version:message-id:date:reply-to:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SGNt4e9laK8CgTGZPReueyCRkWN+R0nF15NkRMjE5v8=; b=X9/3f59HPvIPvoeWH/ZUSn68GlhI0OPFmmJvVrbYkjIH93kCmyF36s3As1WH6Gzey2 CHtb0h0e0pdJ8rOXFiqCdAlUW0muQ7Sg17sOFjt+vxwfsqK2blqYc67G017cSRIMd71V ehY0/qByI0vlVHB4x1I64AT3eIgSOk0KfIA7v+mZ44QdkXfK8IdHLecNHlN8f0pUajJv srk0qByTmFERCF/3ZoHfuTc3iLkRzZt4IaEDWxCUGtKym0PXC06POU1SbenVqZAMd/Ct uBGkh9tQV0jNwTAh5yk0FmqEmVUY/NwDz6QlefQhradbFTAjMhgzzc/IK8t/S0qwLDcv TNhg== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxINiIAtj1Fn92BNfUR+WZBF+mWxX5HLegT94b5tXuLSA7ZjdqN wbWJNhBvBLlcmuVkqEWK1bHfqtmmHpoN0pMHwuvUyRVVlv5bwQOck++aBrSDnZvTegA0TXoG+3l By38GjH0WP4kzh6o= X-Received: by 2002:a7b:ce14:0:b0:3f9:7a15:1716 with SMTP id m20-20020a7bce14000000b003f97a151716mr9029797wmc.5.1687379850714; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7mZ1TbPOgz6AZzogWLXb6lQqm580y/AmcT6Tck/xzP1b4Z8VbsvtMPvY4/wVQHHqc5v/v7hw== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:ce14:0:b0:3f9:7a15:1716 with SMTP id m20-20020a7bce14000000b003f97a151716mr9029786wmc.5.1687379850347; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com (static-92-120-85-188.ipcom.comunitel.net. [188.85.120.92]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bi20-20020a05600c3d9400b003f7f475c3bcsm78041wmb.1.2023.06.21.13.37.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 21 Jun 2023 13:37:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Juan Quintela To: Peter Xu Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Laurent Vivier , Thomas Huth , Peter Maydell , Daniel P . =?utf-8?Q?Berrang=C3=A9?= , Leonardo Bras , Yury Kotov Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/42] migration-test: Enable back ignore-shared test In-Reply-To: (Peter Xu's message of "Wed, 21 Jun 2023 15:53:41 -0400") References: <20230608224943.3877-1-quintela@redhat.com> <20230608224943.3877-13-quintela@redhat.com> <87jzvwa9nj.fsf@secure.mitica> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 22:37:29 +0200 Message-ID: <87pm5o8sc6.fsf@secure.mitica> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=quintela@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Peter Xu wrote: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 09:38:08PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote: >> Peter Xu wrote: >> > On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 12:49:13AM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote: >> >> It failed on aarch64 tcg, lets see if that is still the case. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela >> > >> > According to the history: >> > >> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20190305180635.GA3803@work-vm/ >> > >> > It's never enabled, and not sure whether Yury followed it up. Juan: have >> > you tried it out on aarch64 before enabling it again? I assume we rely on >> > the previous patch but that doesn't even sound like aarch64 specific. I >> > worry it'll just keep failing on aarch64. >> On multifd+cancel. >> >> I have no been able to ever get ignore_shared to fail on my machine. >> But I didn't tested aarch64 TCG in the past so hard, and in x86_64 it >> has always worked for me. > > Thanks a lot, Juan. > > Do you mean master is broken with QEMU_TEST_FLAKY_TESTS=1? And after the > whole series applied we cannot trigger issue in the few hours test even > with it? > > Shall we wait for another 1-2 days to see whether Yury would comment > (before you repost)? Otherwise I agree if it survives your few-hours test > we should give it a try - at least according to Dave's comment before it > was failing easily, but it is not now on the test bed. > > Maybe it's still just hidden, but in that case I also agree enabling it in > the repo is the simplest way to reproduce the failure again, if we still > ever want to enable it one day.. Sending v2. In that serie both re-enablement of multifd+cancel and ingnore_shared are the last two patches. So I am going to wait until all other patches are in and that the people that complained the most: Peter Maydell, Daniel and Thomas say/test on their cases. Hint, Hint. Later, Juan.