From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48870) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g02Eq-0007n1-EN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 06:19:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g02Em-0000LA-TG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 06:19:12 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-x243.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::243]:36538) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g02Em-0000Kv-CQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 06:19:08 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-x243.google.com with SMTP id j192-v6so1765027wmj.1 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 03:19:07 -0700 (PDT) References: <20180911140631.18481-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> <20180911140631.18481-4-alex.bennee@linaro.org> <8346c1bb-9cb6-4c08-66a2-b5e5a31903d4@vivier.eu> <87tvmwax7m.fsf@linaro.org> <8c9a56ac-5b3f-cbe3-49ce-e79314b1c4db@denx.de> From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= In-reply-to: <8c9a56ac-5b3f-cbe3-49ce-e79314b1c4db@denx.de> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 11:19:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87pnxjauhy.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/4] linux-user/nios2: bump min uname to 4.16.0 [!HACK] List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Marek Vasut Cc: Laurent Vivier , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, 1791796@bugs.launchpad.net, thuth@redhat.com, Riku Voipio , Chris Wulff Marek Vasut writes: > On 09/11/2018 05:08 PM, Alex Benn=C3=A9e wrote: >> >> Marek Vasut writes: >> >>> On 09/11/2018 04:14 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: >>>> Le 11/09/2018 =C3=A0 16:06, Alex Benn=C3=A9e a =C3=A9crit: >> >> I don't think so - it's an artefact of the way the buildroot toolchain >> is built. But the real question which I address in the cover letter is >> does nios2-linux-user get much use? I tried enabled tests/tcg for it and >> it fails rather badly. > > I used it around 2.10 and it worked for me. I've just build 2.10.2 (with a patch for memfd and this one) and get the same failures on the tcg/tests tests. What testing where you running? -- Alex Benn=C3=A9e