From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57764) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c7P5C-0005HA-F2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:58:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c7P58-0006Dz-M6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:58:38 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]:36233) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c7P58-0006DG-E4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:58:34 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id g23so319589975wme.1 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 07:58:34 -0800 (PST) From: Vincent Bernat References: <147939644067.238.10993052538213615164@9040ca97f87d> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 16:58:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: <147939644067.238.10993052538213615164@9040ca97f87d> (no-reply@patchew.org's message of "Thu, 17 Nov 2016 07:27:23 -0800 (PST)") Message-ID: <87poluw120.fsf@luffy.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tftp: fake support for netascii protocol List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, famz@redhat.com, samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org, jan.kiszka@siemens.com =E2=9D=A6 17 novembre 2016 07:27 -0800, no-reply@patchew.org=C2=A0: > =3D=3D=3D OUTPUT BEGIN =3D=3D=3D > Checking PATCH 1/1: tftp: fake support for netascii protocol... > ERROR: suspect code indent for conditional statements (2, 6) > #24: FILE: slirp/tftp.c:329: > + if (strcasecmp(&tp->x.tp_buf[k], "octet") =3D=3D 0) { > + k +=3D 6; > > ERROR: suspect code indent for conditional statements (2, 6) > #26: FILE: slirp/tftp.c:331: > + } else if (strcasecmp(&tp->x.tp_buf[k], "netascii") =3D=3D 0) { > + k +=3D 9; Indentation is consistent with what the remaining of the file. > ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s) Should I resend the patch for that or the amendment I sent in another mail is sufficient? --=20 Vincent Bernat =E2=80=94 Vincent.Bernat@exoscale.ch =E2=9D=AC=E2=9D=B1 https://www.exoscale.ch