From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [ANNOUNCE] We are now in soft freeze for 1.6
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 07:52:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ppuculby.fsf@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA--wyW==_-Q9yizVE3aJAFVsmnQkqpoEiM9RnmAaZmq9A@mail.gmail.com>
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> On 15 July 2013 16:15, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Hard freeze is two weeks away.
>>
>> http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/1.6
>
> I've just noticed that this is still inconsistent. That
> page says:
>
> "Soft feature freeze. Major features should have initial code
> committed by this date."
>
> but it links to http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/SoftFeatureFreeze
> which says
> "By the date of the soft feature freeze, any major feature
> should have some code posted to the qemu-devel mailing list"
>
> I'm pretty sure the latter is right (you only need code
> posted, not committed) -- can we fix whichever of the two
> pages is wrong, please?
It depends on the definition of "major". Any *feature* should have
patches posted by soft freeze. I guess a tiny feature would be an
exception.
For major features (things that have a high likelihood of breaking
things), the feature should have started getting merged already.
I'll update the wiki text to be clearer.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-21 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-15 15:15 [Qemu-devel] [ANNOUNCE] We are now in soft freeze for 1.6 Anthony Liguori
2013-07-19 11:07 ` Peter Maydell
2013-07-21 12:52 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2013-10-15 12:50 ` Peter Maydell
2013-10-18 14:38 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ppuculby.fsf@codemonkey.ws \
--to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).