From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Jason J . Herne" <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 12/12] hw/s390x/s390-skeys: lazy storage key enablement under TCG
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 16:13:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r1f6y82x.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f56f6ad1-1f80-743c-482b-7dbf4cb75360@redhat.com>
On Fri, Aug 06 2021, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06.08.21 11:42, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 05/08/2021 17.28, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> -static void qemu_s390_skeys_init(Object *obj)
>>> +static int qemu_s390_skeys_enabled(S390SKeysState *ss)
>>> {
>>> - QEMUS390SKeysState *skeys = QEMU_S390_SKEYS(obj);
>>> - MachineState *machine = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
>>> + QEMUS390SKeysState *skeys = QEMU_S390_SKEYS(ss);
>>>
>>> - skeys->key_count = machine->ram_size / TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
>>> - skeys->keydata = g_malloc0(skeys->key_count);
>>> + /* Lockless check is sufficient. */
>>> + return !!skeys->keydata;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static int qemu_s390_skeys_enabled(S390SKeysState *ss)
>>> +static int qemu_s390_skeys_enable(S390SKeysState *ss)
>>
>> Could you please call this qemu_s390_skeys_activate() so that it's not so
>> easily confused with the ..._enabled() function?
>
> Well, you enable it and you check if it's enabled ... so using different
> terminology is more confusing, no?
>
> I could rename _enabled to is_enabled to make the difference easiert to
> sport here.
is_enabled certainly is better than just enabled; otherwise, the two
function names are just way too similar.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-06 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-05 15:27 [PATCH v1 00/12] s390x: skey related fixes, cleanups, and memory device preparations David Hildenbrand
2021-08-05 15:27 ` [PATCH v1 01/12] s390x/tcg: wrap address for RRBE David Hildenbrand
2021-08-06 5:39 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-05 15:27 ` [PATCH v1 02/12] s390x/tcg: fix ignoring bit 63 when setting the storage key in SSKE David Hildenbrand
2021-08-06 6:19 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-06 6:25 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-06 6:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-05 15:27 ` [PATCH v1 03/12] s390x/tcg: convert real to absolute address for RRBE, SSKE and ISKE David Hildenbrand
2021-08-06 6:50 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-06 6:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-06 7:11 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-06 7:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-06 11:25 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-08-06 11:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-05 15:27 ` [PATCH v1 04/12] s390x/tcg: check for addressing exceptions for " David Hildenbrand
2021-08-05 17:33 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-05 15:27 ` [PATCH v1 05/12] s390x/mmu_helper: no need to pass access type to mmu_translate_asce() David Hildenbrand
2021-08-06 7:30 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-06 7:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-06 7:36 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-06 7:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-05 15:27 ` [PATCH v1 06/12] s390x/mmu_helper: fixup mmu_translate() documentation David Hildenbrand
2021-08-06 7:32 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-05 15:27 ` [PATCH v1 07/12] s390x/mmu_helper: move address validation into mmu_translate*() David Hildenbrand
2021-08-06 8:18 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-06 8:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-06 8:22 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-06 8:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-06 8:24 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-06 8:20 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-05 15:28 ` [PATCH v1 08/12] s390x/mmu_helper: avoid setting the storage key if nothing changed David Hildenbrand
2021-08-06 8:24 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-05 15:28 ` [PATCH v1 09/12] hw/s390x/s390-skeys: use memory mapping to detect which storage keys to migrate David Hildenbrand
2021-08-06 8:47 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-05 15:28 ` [PATCH v1 10/12] hw/s390x/s390-skeys: use memory mapping to detect which storage keys to dump David Hildenbrand
2021-08-06 8:51 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-05 15:28 ` [PATCH v1 11/12] hw/s390x/s390-skeys: check if an address is valid before dumping the key David Hildenbrand
2021-08-06 8:53 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-06 8:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-05 15:28 ` [PATCH v1 12/12] hw/s390x/s390-skeys: lazy storage key enablement under TCG David Hildenbrand
2021-08-06 9:42 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-06 13:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-06 13:52 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-11 8:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-06 14:13 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-08-06 14:17 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r1f6y82x.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).