From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59250) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUZV6-0003cb-Tu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:17:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUZV3-0000nD-NA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:17:24 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c]:36273) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUZV3-0000mi-Dj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:17:21 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id h22so62283515lfk.3 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 07:17:21 -0700 (PDT) References: <20170621144814.15324-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> <6152fff6-f4db-b0c2-bf20-181364544412@amsat.org> <87wp84rr6h.fsf@linaro.org> From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= In-reply-to: Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 15:17:17 +0100 Message-ID: <87r2xo9y1e.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/21] Docker and shippable updates List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Cc: Fam Zheng , Peter Maydell , QEMU Developers Philippe Mathieu-Daudé writes: > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Alex Bennée wrote: >>> Now we've been running shippable for a while is it worth turning on the >>> IRC notifications? >> >> What about moving such bot/scripts notifications in another channel >> like #QEMU-notifications? > > ping? I'm in two minds so I suspect this is something that needs to be taken to the users of #qemu. >> It is often hard to follow 3 concurrent topics while the travis-ci bot >> disrupts entering/broadcasting/leaving... I find it useful as its somewhere I look at a lot. That said it is not exactly a trial to sub to yet another IRC channel. >> I'd also like to see here checkpatch/patchew stripped output, and >> eventually gcov/gprof reports. >> I don't think full patchew reports are useful in a mailbox. I disagree. They could certainly be made terser but I think the general workflow of posting automated testing reports to patch series is a useful one. -- Alex Bennée