qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Liviu Ionescu <ilg@livius.net>,
	Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>,
	patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] [PATCH 5/6] armv7m: Fix reads of CONTROL register bit 1
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:58:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r33s9yzr.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1484937883-1068-6-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org>


Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:

> From: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
>
> The v7m CONTROL register bit 1 is SPSEL, which indicates
> the stack being used. We were storing this information
> not in v7m.control but in the separate v7m.other_sp
> structure field. Unfortunately, the code handling reads
> of the CONTROL register didn't take account of this, and
> so if SPSEL was updated by an exception entry or exit then
> a subsequent guest read of CONTROL would get the wrong value.
>
> Using a separate structure field doesn't really gain us
> anything in efficiency, so drop this unnecessary complexity
> in favour of simply storing all the bits in v7m.control.
>
> This is a migration compatibility break for M profile
> CPUs only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
> [PMM: rewrote commit message;
>  use deposit32(); use FIELD to define constants for
>  masking and shifting of CONTROL register fields
> ]
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
>  target/arm/cpu.h       |  1 -
>  target/arm/internals.h |  7 +++++++
>  target/arm/helper.c    | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  target/arm/machine.c   |  6 ++----
>  4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
> index 151a5d7..521c11b 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
> @@ -405,7 +405,6 @@ typedef struct CPUARMState {
>          uint32_t vecbase;
>          uint32_t basepri;
>          uint32_t control;
> -        int current_sp;
>          int exception;
>      } v7m;
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/internals.h b/target/arm/internals.h
> index 3cae5ff..2e65bc1 100644
> --- a/target/arm/internals.h
> +++ b/target/arm/internals.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
>  #ifndef TARGET_ARM_INTERNALS_H
>  #define TARGET_ARM_INTERNALS_H
>
> +#include "hw/registerfields.h"
> +
>  /* register banks for CPU modes */
>  #define BANK_USRSYS 0
>  #define BANK_SVC    1
> @@ -75,6 +77,11 @@ static const char * const excnames[] = {
>   */
>  #define GTIMER_SCALE 16
>
> +/* Bit definitions for the v7M CONTROL register */
> +FIELD(V7M_CONTROL, NPRIV, 0, 1)
> +FIELD(V7M_CONTROL, SPSEL, 1, 1)
> +FIELD(V7M_CONTROL, FPCA, 2, 1)
> +
>  /*
>   * For AArch64, map a given EL to an index in the banked_spsr array.
>   * Note that this mapping and the AArch32 mapping defined in bank_number()
> diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
> index 8edb08c..dc383d1 100644
> --- a/target/arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target/arm/helper.c
> @@ -5947,14 +5947,19 @@ static uint32_t v7m_pop(CPUARMState *env)
>  }
>
>  /* Switch to V7M main or process stack pointer.  */
> -static void switch_v7m_sp(CPUARMState *env, int process)
> +static void switch_v7m_sp(CPUARMState *env, bool new_spsel)
>  {
>      uint32_t tmp;
> -    if (env->v7m.current_sp != process) {
> +    bool old_spsel = env->v7m.control & R_V7M_CONTROL_SPSEL_MASK;
> +
> +    if (old_spsel != new_spsel) {
>          tmp = env->v7m.other_sp;
>          env->v7m.other_sp = env->regs[13];
>          env->regs[13] = tmp;
> -        env->v7m.current_sp = process;
> +
> +        env->v7m.control = deposit32(env->v7m.control,
> +                                     R_V7M_CONTROL_SPSEL_SHIFT,
> +                                     R_V7M_CONTROL_SPSEL_LENGTH,
> new_spsel);

I was thrown by the use of deposit32 here without the extract32. However
I see we are dealing with a bit here - shame there isn't set_bit32()
method.

>      }
>  }
>
> @@ -6049,8 +6054,9 @@ void arm_v7m_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
>      arm_log_exception(cs->exception_index);
>
>      lr = 0xfffffff1;
> -    if (env->v7m.current_sp)
> +    if (env->v7m.control & R_V7M_CONTROL_SPSEL_MASK) {
>          lr |= 4;
> +    }
>      if (env->v7m.exception == 0)
>          lr |= 8;
>
> @@ -8294,9 +8300,11 @@ uint32_t HELPER(v7m_mrs)(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t reg)
>
>      switch (reg) {
>      case 8: /* MSP */
> -        return env->v7m.current_sp ? env->v7m.other_sp : env->regs[13];
> +        return (env->v7m.control & R_V7M_CONTROL_SPSEL_MASK) ?
> +            env->v7m.other_sp : env->regs[13];
>      case 9: /* PSP */
> -        return env->v7m.current_sp ? env->regs[13] : env->v7m.other_sp;
> +        return (env->v7m.control & R_V7M_CONTROL_SPSEL_MASK) ?
> +            env->regs[13] : env->v7m.other_sp;
>      case 16: /* PRIMASK */
>          return (env->daif & PSTATE_I) != 0;
>      case 17: /* BASEPRI */
> @@ -8326,16 +8334,18 @@ void HELPER(v7m_msr)(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t reg, uint32_t val)
>          }
>          break;
>      case 8: /* MSP */
> -        if (env->v7m.current_sp)
> +        if (env->v7m.control & R_V7M_CONTROL_SPSEL_MASK) {
>              env->v7m.other_sp = val;
> -        else
> +        } else {
>              env->regs[13] = val;
> +        }
>          break;
>      case 9: /* PSP */
> -        if (env->v7m.current_sp)
> +        if (env->v7m.control & R_V7M_CONTROL_SPSEL_MASK) {
>              env->regs[13] = val;
> -        else
> +        } else {
>              env->v7m.other_sp = val;
> +        }
>          break;
>      case 16: /* PRIMASK */
>          if (val & 1) {
> @@ -8360,8 +8370,9 @@ void HELPER(v7m_msr)(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t reg, uint32_t val)
>          }
>          break;
>      case 20: /* CONTROL */
> -        env->v7m.control = val & 3;
> -        switch_v7m_sp(env, (val & 2) != 0);
> +        switch_v7m_sp(env, (val & R_V7M_CONTROL_SPSEL_MASK) != 0);
> +        env->v7m.control = val & (R_V7M_CONTROL_SPSEL_MASK |
> +                                  R_V7M_CONTROL_NPRIV_MASK);
>          break;
>      default:
>          qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "Attempt to write unknown special"
> diff --git a/target/arm/machine.c b/target/arm/machine.c
> index d90943b..8ed24bf 100644
> --- a/target/arm/machine.c
> +++ b/target/arm/machine.c
> @@ -96,15 +96,13 @@ static bool m_needed(void *opaque)
>
>  static const VMStateDescription vmstate_m = {
>      .name = "cpu/m",
> -    .version_id = 1,
> -    .minimum_version_id = 1,
> +    .version_id = 2,
> +    .minimum_version_id = 2,
>      .needed = m_needed,
>      .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
> -        VMSTATE_UINT32(env.v7m.other_sp, ARMCPU),
>          VMSTATE_UINT32(env.v7m.vecbase, ARMCPU),
>          VMSTATE_UINT32(env.v7m.basepri, ARMCPU),
>          VMSTATE_UINT32(env.v7m.control, ARMCPU),
> -        VMSTATE_INT32(env.v7m.current_sp, ARMCPU),
>          VMSTATE_INT32(env.v7m.exception, ARMCPU),
>          VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
>      }

Not that it matters for this but is there a way to add another level of
indirection to the reading and writing of these fields to keep the same
migration format?

Anyway:

Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>

--
Alex Bennée

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-24 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-20 18:44 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] ARMv7M: some simple bugfixes and cleanups Peter Maydell
2017-01-20 18:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6] armv7m: MRS/MSR: handle unprivileged access Peter Maydell
2017-01-24 16:25   ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] " Alex Bennée
2017-01-24 16:51     ` Peter Maydell
2017-01-20 18:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/6] armv7m: Replace armv7m.hack with unassigned_access handler Peter Maydell
2017-01-24 16:31   ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] " Alex Bennée
2017-01-24 16:53     ` Peter Maydell
2017-01-20 18:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/6] armv7m: Explicit error for bad vector table Peter Maydell
2017-01-24 16:43   ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] " Alex Bennée
2017-01-20 18:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] hw/registerfields.h: Pull FIELD etc macros out of hw/register.h Peter Maydell
2017-01-20 19:04   ` Alistair Francis
2017-01-24 16:43   ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] " Alex Bennée
2017-01-20 18:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6] armv7m: Fix reads of CONTROL register bit 1 Peter Maydell
2017-01-24 16:58   ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2017-01-24 17:04     ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] " Peter Maydell
2017-01-20 18:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] armv7m: Clear FAULTMASK on return from non-NMI exceptions Peter Maydell
2017-01-24 16:59   ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] " Alex Bennée
2017-01-20 19:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] ARMv7M: some simple bugfixes and cleanups no-reply
2017-01-24 17:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] " Alex Bennée

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r33s9yzr.fsf@linaro.org \
    --to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=ilg@livius.net \
    --cc=mdavidsaver@gmail.com \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).