Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rdma: Fix cleanup in error paths

[Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>]

Padmanabh Ratnakar <padmanabh.ratnakar@Emulex.Com> wrote:
> As part of commit e325b49a320b493cc5d69e263751ff716dc458fe,
> order in which resources are destroyed was changed for fixing
> a seg fault. Due to this change, CQ will never get destroyed as
> CQ should be destroyed after QP destruction. Seg fault is caused
> improper cleanup when connection fails. Fixing cleanup after
> connection failure and order in which resources are destroyed
> in qemu_rdma_cleanup() routine.
>
> Signed-off-by: Meghana Cheripady <meghana.cheripady@emulex.com>
> Signed-off-by: Padmanabh Ratnakar <padmanabh.ratnakar@emulex.com>
> ---
>  migration/rdma.c |   22 ++++++++--------------
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/rdma.c b/migration/rdma.c
> index e6c3a67..77e3444 100644
> --- a/migration/rdma.c
> +++ b/migration/rdma.c
> @@ -2194,6 +2194,10 @@ static void qemu_rdma_cleanup(RDMAContext *rdma)
>          }
>      }
>  
> +    if (rdma->qp) {
> +        rdma_destroy_qp(rdma->cm_id);
> +        rdma->qp = NULL;
> +    }

Agreed with this change.


>      if (rdma->cq) {
>          ibv_destroy_cq(rdma->cq);
>          rdma->cq = NULL;
> @@ -2206,18 +2210,14 @@ static void qemu_rdma_cleanup(RDMAContext *rdma)
>          ibv_dealloc_pd(rdma->pd);
>          rdma->pd = NULL;
>      }
> -    if (rdma->listen_id) {
> -        rdma_destroy_id(rdma->listen_id);
> -        rdma->listen_id = NULL;
> -    }

I am not sure about this one.  We have (receiving side)

create listen_id
cm_id = rdma_accept(listen_id)

So, it looks better to do the cleanup in the other order, but notice
that with current code, I think this don't matter (i.e. we can't call
qemu_rdma_cleanup() from other place that accept).


>      if (rdma->cm_id) {
> -        if (rdma->qp) {
> -            rdma_destroy_qp(rdma->cm_id);
> -            rdma->qp = NULL;
> -        }

This is the "companion" of the 1st chunk, and I agree with the c"

>          rdma_destroy_id(rdma->cm_id);
>          rdma->cm_id = NULL;
>      }
> +    if (rdma->listen_id) {
> +        rdma_destroy_id(rdma->listen_id);
> +        rdma->listen_id = NULL;
> +    }

Companion of the second chunk that I can't understand why it is moved.

>      if (rdma->channel) {
>          rdma_destroy_event_channel(rdma->channel);
>          rdma->channel = NULL;
> @@ -2309,8 +2309,6 @@ static int qemu_rdma_connect(RDMAContext *rdma, Error **errp)
>      if (ret) {
>          perror("rdma_connect");
>          ERROR(errp, "connecting to destination!");
> -        rdma_destroy_id(rdma->cm_id);
> -        rdma->cm_id = NULL;
>          goto err_rdma_source_connect;
>      }

This other three are nice, remove code, and make it correct with the
case that qp has to be removed first.

So, should we drop the listen_id part, or there is a reason for it?

Later, Juan.


> @@ -2319,8 +2317,6 @@ static int qemu_rdma_connect(RDMAContext *rdma, Error **errp)
>          perror("rdma_get_cm_event after rdma_connect");
>          ERROR(errp, "connecting to destination!");
>          rdma_ack_cm_event(cm_event);
> -        rdma_destroy_id(rdma->cm_id);
> -        rdma->cm_id = NULL;
>          goto err_rdma_source_connect;
>      }
>  
> @@ -2328,8 +2324,6 @@ static int qemu_rdma_connect(RDMAContext *rdma, Error **errp)
>          perror("rdma_get_cm_event != EVENT_ESTABLISHED after rdma_connect");
>          ERROR(errp, "connecting to destination!");
>          rdma_ack_cm_event(cm_event);
> -        rdma_destroy_id(rdma->cm_id);
> -        rdma->cm_id = NULL;
>          goto err_rdma_source_connect;
>      }
>      rdma->connected = true;