From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41408) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZS4W-00024F-4Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 16:31:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZS4Q-0001IZ-JX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 16:31:44 -0400 Received: from e23smtp03.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.145]:44479) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZS4Q-0001IB-29 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 16:31:38 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp03.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 7 May 2013 06:23:28 +1000 Received: from d23relay05.au.ibm.com (d23relay05.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.152]) by d23dlp01.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259DB2CE804D for ; Tue, 7 May 2013 06:31:31 +1000 (EST) Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (d23av03.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.97]) by d23relay05.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r46KHV1r24313938 for ; Tue, 7 May 2013 06:17:32 +1000 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r46KVTH4030237 for ; Tue, 7 May 2013 06:31:29 +1000 From: Anthony Liguori In-Reply-To: References: <87wqrci2zs.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 15:31:19 -0500 Message-ID: <87r4hj4zqg.fsf@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Last Call for 1.5 before Hard Freeze List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jordan Justen Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel , Gleb Natapov Jordan Justen writes: > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> I believe I have processed all of the outstanding pull requests and >> patches tagged for 1.5. If there are any other patches or pull requests >> you would like to be considered, please respond to this note with a >> pointer to the patch or make sure you send it out tagged with 'for-1.5' >> no later than 5pm US/Eastern. > > Is there a chance of including the KVM PC flash series in 1.5? > Unfortunately, I'm assuming no given the timing. I think we're going to need to delay it. Did we ever come to a consensus about what to do on older kernels? Regards, Anthony Liguori > > It does seem less than ideal to have -pflash go from working on qemu > 1.2-1.4, to silently being ignored in 1.5, and then working again in > 1.6... > > -Jordan