From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-rng and fd passing
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 17:05:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r4jy90wt.fsf@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51311A13.6030205@redhat.com>
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> writes:
> On 03/01/2013 02:08 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>>>> You can pass chardevs to the egd backend. It's really not a good idea
>>>> to pass a fd via rng-rangom.
>
> Why not? If you are running a single guest, why can't libvirt pass that
> one guest an fd instead of making qemu open() the file?
Why can't QEMU just open(/dev/random)? What's the advantage of libvirt
doing the open?
>>> Fine, then we won't use fd passing for this device, whatever the reason
>>> may be.
>>
>> So let's step back. There are two backends currently supported:
>> rng-random and rng-egd. I don't see any point in taking an fd for
>> rng-random. I don't think labeling comes into play here.
>>
>> But if libvirt wants to interact with virtio-rng in a more intelligent
>> way (implementing a policy to distribute entropy), then rng-egd is the
>> right way to do that.
>
> Yes, libvirt will probably use rng-egd when distributing randomness
> among multiple guests. But libvirt wants to target BOTH forms of rng,
> in order to let the user choose which one is best for their needs. If
> rng-random is not useful to any end user, then why did qemu expose it in
> the first place? And if qemu thought it was worth exposing, then
> libvirt thinks it is worth targetting, and by using qemu_open instead of
> raw open, then fd passing is possible. Policy (whether it makes sense
> to pass an fd for a random generator, and whether /dev/random or
> /dev/urandom or something else is best) may be important, but it is
> orthogonal to the issue that I raised about consistency.
It seems a bit silly to me for QEMU to never open a file and to reinvent
a namespace (via fdsets) to serve that purpose.
I understand the reason that fdsets exist (because NFS is stupid and
doesn't support labeling). But we aren't doing dynamic labeling of
/dev/random and I strongly suspect it's not on NFS anyway.
So why are we trying to pass fds here?
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
> --
> Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
> Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-01 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <512FF819.7050505@redhat.com>
2013-03-01 9:51 ` [Qemu-devel] virtio-rng and fd passing Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-04 4:29 ` Amit Shah
2013-03-06 6:20 ` Amit Shah
2013-03-01 19:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-03-01 20:13 ` Stefan Berger
2013-03-01 20:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-03-01 20:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-01 20:04 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-03-01 20:34 ` Stefan Berger
2013-03-01 21:08 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-03-01 21:13 ` Eric Blake
2013-03-01 23:05 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2013-03-01 23:14 ` Eric Blake
2013-03-01 23:59 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-03-02 0:29 ` Eric Blake
2013-03-02 3:13 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-03-02 12:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-03 21:05 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-03-04 21:57 ` Eric Blake
2013-03-04 22:24 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-03-04 22:35 ` Eric Blake
2013-03-05 4:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-03-04 21:54 ` Eric Blake
2013-03-02 0:34 ` Stefan Berger
2013-03-02 3:17 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-03-02 3:34 ` Stefan Berger
2013-03-03 21:06 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-03-04 15:27 ` Corey Bryant
2013-03-04 10:29 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2013-03-04 15:55 ` Corey Bryant
2013-03-01 22:59 ` Peter Krempa
2013-03-01 23:14 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r4jy90wt.fsf@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).