From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37951 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PuIni-0005To-Cz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 01:11:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PuInh-0007dw-B3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 01:11:14 -0500 Received: from e23smtp06.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.148]:37451) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PuIng-0007dp-Ot for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 01:11:13 -0500 Received: from d23relay05.au.ibm.com (d23relay05.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.247]) by e23smtp06.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p216BAp3010384 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 17:11:10 +1100 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.138]) by d23relay05.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p216BBO51769616 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 17:11:11 +1100 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p216BAoL030989 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 17:11:11 +1100 From: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH -V1 1/4] hw/9pfs: Add file descriptor reclaim support In-Reply-To: <4D6C4F98.4090504@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1296929291-11047-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4D6C4F98.4090504@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 11:41:03 +0530 Message-ID: <87r5argyko.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)" Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 17:44:56 -0800, "Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)" wrote: > On 2/5/2011 10:08 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > This add file descriptor recliam to 9p server > > Please split it into two patches. > > 1. Introducing fsmap. > 2. Introducing the reclaim mechanism. Already did that in my local tree. I will post the new series as a followup This is what i have now hw/9pfs: Add V9fsfidmap in preparation for adding fd reclaim hw/9pfs: Add file descriptor reclaim support hw/9pfs: Use v9fs_do_close instead of close hw/9pfs: Implement syncfs hw/9pfs: Add open flag to fid hw/9pfs: Add directory reclaim support > > Concern: With this we will be traversing the whole fid list for many operations > .. how is > the performance impact? > I haven't done any performance measurements yet -aneesh