From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6E03EB64DA for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 09:37:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qJWGZ-0005VC-DO; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 05:36:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qJWGV-0005UO-7P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 05:36:07 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qJWGP-0003Zt-Vq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 05:36:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1689154559; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ACCFahbLyK33raGRj/W0sACOpn4jX0KHwZxmYOgITVg=; b=AeM1HForO9jdcX07zWGmX2Z9SMpE7SgmJZu8B2QOmrB1BsNro9/I6tXGl/XwmV+QaECTWo ydRZbWGGywM3ug/f5kxdwg2xOgAZamWsLTAJ4Pw6vpmhq50Y3/CnLvsltLvDVzKivW8aLE Uc5fLOdHC+FYlApUoDgSjM7np8PSB1s= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-390-QSVSnOx2PWyXybpvf3q_5A-1; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 05:35:50 -0400 X-MC-Unique: QSVSnOx2PWyXybpvf3q_5A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E251A8FBA20; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 09:35:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dhcp-192-239.str.redhat.com [10.33.192.239]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8711FC09A09; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 09:35:49 +0000 (UTC) From: Cornelia Huck To: "Duan, Zhenzhong" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Cc: "alex.williamson@redhat.com" , "clg@redhat.com" , "jgg@nvidia.com" , "nicolinc@nvidia.com" , "eric.auger@redhat.com" , "peterx@redhat.com" , "jasowang@redhat.com" , "Tian, Kevin" , "Liu, Yi L" , "Sun, Yi Y" , "Peng, Chao P" , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Paolo Bonzini , "open list:Overall KVM CPUs" Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v4 02/24] Update linux-header per VFIO device cdev v14 In-Reply-To: Organization: Red Hat GmbH References: <20230712072528.275577-1-zhenzhong.duan@intel.com> <20230712072528.275577-3-zhenzhong.duan@intel.com> <87v8epk1sh.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.37 (https://notmuchmail.org) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 11:35:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87sf9tjwuj.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.8 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=cohuck@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Wed, Jul 12 2023, "Duan, Zhenzhong" wrote: >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Cornelia Huck >>Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2023 3:49 PM >>Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 02/24] Update linux-header per VFIO device cdev >>v14 >> >>On Wed, Jul 12 2023, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: >> >>> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan >>> --- >>> linux-headers/linux/iommufd.h | 347 >>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> linux-headers/linux/kvm.h | 13 +- >>> linux-headers/linux/vfio.h | 142 +++++++++++++- >>> 3 files changed, 498 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 linux-headers/linux/iommufd.h >> >>Hi, >> >>if this patch is intending to pull code that is not yet integrated in >>the Linux kernel, please mark this as a placeholder patch. If the code >>is already integrated, please run a full headers update against a >>released version (can be -rc) and note that version in the patch >>description. > Thanks for point out, will do in next post. > About "placeholder patch", should I claim it is placeholder in patch > subject or description field, or there is official step to do that? Just put a notice into the subject and/or the patch description; the main idea is to prevent a maintainer from applying it by accident.