From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45794)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1T60z1-0003yC-3Y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:12:09 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1T60yq-0002IO-H3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:12:06 -0400
Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173]:45751)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1T60yq-0002IE-Ct
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:11:56 -0400
Received: by obbta14 with SMTP id ta14so7830382obb.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 08:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1208271837560.4831@linmac>
References: <1345703083-25322-1-git-send-email-mmogilvi_qemu@miniinfo.net>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1208240757430.6894@linmac>
	<87ipc4a1g8.fsf@codemonkey.ws>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1208271808130.2464@linmac>
	<876284l8q6.fsf@codemonkey.ws>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1208271837560.4831@linmac>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:11:47 -0500
Message-ID: <87sjb8fjyk.fsf@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Running Microport UNIX (ca 1987)
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: malc <av1474@comtv.ru>
Cc: Matthew Ogilvie <mmogilvi_qemu@miniinfo.net>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

malc <av1474@comtv.ru> writes:

> On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> malc <av1474@comtv.ru> writes:
>> 
>
> [..snip..]
>
>> >
>> > Number 2 was, and should stay, as the emulation wasn't correct before it,
>> > don't really care about the rest.
>> 
>> Okay, please revert the rest then.
>> 
>
> Done.

Thank you!

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
> [..snip..]
>
> -- 
> mailto:av1474@comtv.ru