From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7527CD116F6 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2025 11:53:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vQOw7-0003Ap-AR; Tue, 02 Dec 2025 06:52:52 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vQOw4-0003AQ-Pi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2025 06:52:48 -0500 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vQOw2-0002wJ-Ua for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2025 06:52:48 -0500 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.10]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4dLJzs2pZCz1sG7h; Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:52:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4dLJzr2V3Qz1sG7Z; Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:52:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4dLJzr0lkSz1qqlW; Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:52:40 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id W5oXt_l26s0b; Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:52:31 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: HDNZK9ZGnzMVPi8yY6uzIsrzMTo+DEbN+0fZDXYakVTqvpLcr1e+diZ0/SfwLYxf Received: from igel.home (aftr-82-135-83-114.dynamic.mnet-online.de [82.135.83.114]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:52:31 +0100 (CET) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EAC822C1925; Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:52:30 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: Vivian Wang Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Laurent Vivier , Luca Bonissi , Richard Henderson Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux-user: Add missing termios baud rates In-Reply-To: <20251202-linux-user-higher-baud-rates-v1-1-14c49ed2474b@iscas.ac.cn> (Vivian Wang's message of "Tue, 02 Dec 2025 13:14:36 +0800") References: <20251202-linux-user-higher-baud-rates-v1-1-14c49ed2474b@iscas.ac.cn> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2025 12:52:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87tsy9m77l.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.18.0.10; envelope-from=whitebox@nefkom.net; helo=mail-out.m-online.net X-Spam_score_int: -23 X-Spam_score: -2.4 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.208, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Dez 02 2025, Vivian Wang wrote: > The test tst-termios-linux requires termios2, which is provided by [1]. > After that the test failure reported in [2] should be resolved by this > patch. I still get a lot of errors with the two patches: error: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-termios-linux.c:196: c_ispeed = 75, expected 1200 error: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-termios-linux.c:269: ospeed 75 ispeed 1200: kernel c_ispeed == 75, expected 1200 error: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-termios-linux.c:274: ospeed 75 ispeed 1200: kernel CIBAUD = __B0 (000000), expected __B1200 (000011) error: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-termios-linux.c:196: c_ispeed = 9600, expected 456789 error: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-termios-linux.c:269: ospeed 9600 ispeed 456789: kernel c_ispeed == 9600, expected 456789 error: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-termios-linux.c:274: ospeed 9600 ispeed 456789: kernel CIBAUD = __B0 (000000), expected __BOTHER (010000) error: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-termios-linux.c:196: c_ispeed = 54321, expected 1234567890 error: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-termios-linux.c:269: ospeed 54321 ispeed 1234567890: kernel c_ispeed == 54321, expected 1234567890 error: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-termios-linux.c:274: ospeed 54321 ispeed 1234567890: kernel CIBAUD = __B0 (000000), expected __BOTHER (010000) ... error: 8343 test failures -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."