From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
To: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
Cc: peterx@redhat.com, lei4.wang@intel.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] migration: enfocre multifd and postcopy preempt to be set before incoming
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 22:34:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ttv08sgh.fsf@secure.mitica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230606101910.20456-2-wei.w.wang@intel.com> (Wei Wang's message of "Tue, 6 Jun 2023 18:19:09 +0800")
Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com> wrote:
> qemu_start_incoming_migration needs to check the number of multifd
> channels or postcopy ram channels to configure the backlog parameter (i.e.
> the maximum length to which the queue of pending connections for sockfd
> may grow) of listen(). So enforce the usage of postcopy-preempt and
> multifd as below:
> - need to use "-incoming defer" on the destination; and
> - set_capability and set_parameter need to be done before migrate_incoming
>
> Otherwise, disable the use of the features and report error messages to
> remind users to adjust the commands.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> ---
> migration/options.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
This bit is wrong
> @@ -998,11 +1013,22 @@ bool migrate_params_check(MigrationParameters *params, Error **errp)
>
> /* x_checkpoint_delay is now always positive */
>
> - if (params->has_multifd_channels && (params->multifd_channels < 1)) {
> - error_setg(errp, QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE,
> - "multifd_channels",
> - "a value between 1 and 255");
> - return false;
> + if (params->has_multifd_channels) {
> + if (params->multifd_channels < 1) {
> + error_setg(errp, QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE,
> + "multifd_channels",
> + "a value between 1 and 255");
> + return false;
> + }
> + if (migrate_incoming_started()) {
> + MigrationState *ms = migrate_get_current();
> +
> + ms->capabilities[MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_MULTIFD] = false;
> + error_setg(errp, QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE,
> + "multifd_channels",
> + "must be set before incoming starts");
> + return false;
> + }
> }
>
> if (params->has_multifd_zlib_level &&
# Start of tls tests
# starting QEMU: exec ./qemu-system-x86_64 -qtest unix:/tmp/qtest-3655124.sock -qtest-log /dev/null -chardev socket,path=/tmp/qtest-3655124.qmp,id=char0 -mon chardev=char0,mode=control -display none -accel kvm -accel tcg -name source,debug-threads=on -m 150M -serial file:/tmp/migration-test-5QEX61/src_serial -drive file=/tmp/migration-test-5QEX61/bootsect,format=raw 2>/dev/null -accel qtest
# starting QEMU: exec ./qemu-system-x86_64 -qtest unix:/tmp/qtest-3655124.sock -qtest-log /dev/null -chardev socket,path=/tmp/qtest-3655124.qmp,id=char0 -mon chardev=char0,mode=control -display none -accel kvm -accel tcg -name target,debug-threads=on -m 150M -serial file:/tmp/migration-test-5QEX61/dest_serial -incoming unix:/tmp/migration-test-5QEX61/migsocket -drive file=/tmp/migration-test-5QEX61/bootsect,format=raw 2>/dev/null -accel qtest
# {
# "error": {
# "class": "GenericError",
# "desc": "Parameter 'multifd_channels' expects must be set before incoming starts"
# }
# }
**
ERROR:../../../../../mnt/code/qemu/full/tests/qtest/libqtest.c:1259:qtest_vqmp_assert_success_ref: assertion failed: (qdict_haskey(response, "return"))
not ok /x86_64/migration/postcopy/recovery/tls/psk - ERROR:../../../../../mnt/code/qemu/full/tests/qtest/libqtest.c:1259:qtest_vqmp_assert_success_ref: assertion failed: (qdict_haskey(response, "return"))
Bail out!
Aborted (core dumped)
This is the tests that fails.
qtest_add_func("/migration/postcopy/preempt/plain", test_postcopy_preempt);
I am dropping that change and let the others, which are right.
I think what we should do is changing that check to:
static bool migration_has_started(void)
{
MigrationIncomingState *mis = migration_incoming_get_current();
if (mis->state != MIGRATION_STATUS_NONE) {
return true;
}
MigrationState *ms = migration_get_current();
if (mis->state != MIGRATION_STATUS_NONE) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
And for all the parameters that can't be changed after migration has
started do:
if (params->has_multifd_channels) {
if (params->multifd_channels < 1) {
error_setg(errp, QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE,
"multifd_channels",
"a value between 1 and 255");
return false;
}
if (migration_has_started()) {
error_setg(errp, QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE,
"multifd_channels",
"must be set before migration starts");
return false;
}
}
Forr all parameters, can they be changed after migration has started:
compress_level: NO
compress_threads: NO
compress_wait_thread: NO
decompress_threads: NO
throttle_trigger_threshold: MAYBE
cpu_throttle_initial: NO
cpu_throttle_increment: NO?
cpu_throotle_tailslow: NO?
tls_creds: NO
tls_hostname: NO
max_bandwidth: YES
downtime_limit: YES
x_checkpoint_delay: NO?
block_incremental: NO
multifd_channels: NO
multifd_compression: NO
multifd_zlib_devel: NO
multifd_zstd_level: NO
xbzrle_cache_size: YES
max_cpu_throttle: YES?
announce_*: YES (but it shouldn't. There is no good reason for changing
it in the middle of migration. But no harm either)
block_bitmap_mapping: NO?
zero_copy_send: NO
vcpu_dirty_limit_period: NO?
vcpu_dirty_limit: NO?
For capabilities, I think none make sense to change after migration starts.
What do you think?
Later, Juan.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-21 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-06 10:19 [PATCH RESEND v2 0/2] Enfore multifd and postcopy preempt setting Wei Wang
2023-06-06 10:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] migration: enfocre multifd and postcopy preempt to be set before incoming Wei Wang
2023-06-21 19:41 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-21 20:34 ` Juan Quintela [this message]
2023-06-06 10:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] qtest/migration-tests.c: use "-incoming defer" for postcopy tests Wei Wang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-05-30 9:02 [PATCH v2 0/2] Enfore multifd and postcopy preempt setting Wei Wang
2023-05-30 9:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] migration: enfocre multifd and postcopy preempt to be set before incoming Wei Wang
2023-05-30 14:35 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ttv08sgh.fsf@secure.mitica \
--to=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=lei4.wang@intel.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).