From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
To: Het Gala <het.gala@nutanix.com>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, prerna.saxena@nutanix.com,
dgilbert@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com,
eblake@redhat.com, manish.mishra@nutanix.com,
aravind.retnakaran@nutanix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] migration: Introduced MigrateChannelList struct to migration code flow.
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 10:34:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ttwbfjb0.fsf@secure.mitica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <06881487-aa29-ed63-53da-6f4323bd7cc6@nutanix.com> (Het Gala's message of "Tue, 16 May 2023 22:48:16 +0530")
Het Gala <het.gala@nutanix.com> wrote:
> On 15/05/23 4:12 pm, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>> On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 02:32:40PM +0000, Het Gala wrote:
>>> Integrated MigrateChannelList with all transport backends (socket, exec
>>> and rdma) for both source and destination migration code flow.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Aravind Retnakaran <aravind.retnakaran@nutanix.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Het Gala <het.gala@nutanix.com>
>>> ---
>>> migration/migration.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>> migration/socket.c | 5 ++-
>>> 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Error *local_err = NULL;
>>> + MigrateChannel *val = g_new0(MigrateChannel, 1);
>>> MigrateAddress *addrs = g_new0(MigrateAddress, 1);
>>> SocketAddress *saddr;
>>> InetSocketAddress *isock = &addrs->u.rdma;
>>> @@ -441,6 +442,7 @@ static bool migrate_uri_parse(const char *uri,
>>> }
>>> if (local_err) {
>>> + qapi_free_MigrateChannel(val);
>>> qapi_free_MigrateAddress(addrs);
>>> qapi_free_SocketAddress(saddr);
>>> qapi_free_InetSocketAddress(isock);
>>> @@ -448,7 +450,9 @@ static bool migrate_uri_parse(const char *uri,
>>> return false;
>>> }
>>> - *channel = addrs;
>>> + val->channeltype = MIGRATE_CHANNEL_TYPE_MAIN;
>>> + val->addr = addrs;
>>> + *channel = val;
>>> return true;
>>> }
>>> @@ -457,8 +461,9 @@ static void
>>> qemu_start_incoming_migration(const char *uri, bool has_channels,
>>> Error **errp)
>>> {
>>> Error *local_err = NULL;
>>> - MigrateAddress *channel = g_new0(MigrateAddress, 1);
>>> + MigrateAddress *addrs;
>>> SocketAddress *saddr;
>>> + MigrateChannel *channel = NULL;
>>> /*
>>> * Having preliminary checks for uri and channel
>>> @@ -467,22 +472,30 @@ static void qemu_start_incoming_migration(const char *uri, bool has_channels,
>>> error_setg(errp, "'uri' and 'channels' arguments are mutually "
>>> "exclusive; exactly one of the two should be present in "
>>> "'migrate-incoming' qmp command ");
>>> - return;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - /* URI is not suitable for migration? */
>>> - if (!migration_channels_and_uri_compatible(uri, errp)) {
>>> goto out;
>>> - }
>>> + } else if (channels) {
>>> + /* To verify that Migrate channel list has only item */
>>> + if (channels->next) {
>>> + error_setg(errp, "Channel list has more than one entries");
>>> + goto out;
>>> + }
>>> + channel = channels->value;
>>> + } else {
>>> + /* URI is not suitable for migration? */
>>> + if (!migration_channels_and_uri_compatible(uri, errp)) {
>>> + goto out;
>>> + }
>> THis check only gets executed when the caller uses the old
>> URI syntax. We need to it be run when using the modern
>> MigrateChannel QAPI syntax too.
>>
>> IOW, migration_channels_and_uri_compatible() needs converting
>> to take a 'MigrateChannel' object instead of URI, and then
>> the check can be run after the URI -> MigrateCHannel conversion
>
> Yes, Daniel. Got your point. Will change it in the next version.
>
> For Juan's comments, I have not explored the test side code still, so
> is the idea to have some similar test functions like
> test_precopy_tcp_plain, test_precopy_unix_plain but with the new
> syntax ? Please confirm this, and any advice on how appraoch this?
There are several places that use this syntax:
rsp = wait_command(to, "{ 'execute': 'migrate-incoming',"
" 'arguments': { 'uri': 'tcp:127.0.0.1:0' }}");
Just change a couple of them to the new syntax.
I guess you will want to do the multifd tests with the new syntax, not
sure if it makes sense to also test the old one.
I guess you will also want to check that your are catching errors (like
different number of channels on source/destination).
Later, Juan.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-17 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-12 14:32 [PATCH v4 0/8] migration: Modified 'migrate' and 'migrate-incoming' QAPI commands for migration Het Gala
2023-05-12 14:32 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] migration: introduced 'MigrateAddress' in QAPI for migration wire protocol Het Gala
2023-05-15 8:37 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-15 10:06 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-12 14:32 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] migration: Converts uri parameter into 'MigrateAddress' struct Het Gala
2023-05-15 8:43 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-15 10:12 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-15 11:45 ` Het Gala
2023-05-15 11:55 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-15 12:17 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-15 12:25 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-12 14:32 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] migration: converts socket backend to accept MigrateAddress struct Het Gala
2023-05-15 8:55 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-15 10:17 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-15 14:22 ` Het Gala
2023-05-15 14:46 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-15 15:16 ` Het Gala
2023-05-15 16:28 ` Het Gala
2023-05-15 16:42 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-12 14:32 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] migration: converts rdma " Het Gala
2023-05-15 9:51 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-15 10:24 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-15 14:38 ` Het Gala
2023-05-15 14:58 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-15 15:17 ` Het Gala
2023-05-12 14:32 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] migration: converts exec " Het Gala
2023-05-15 9:58 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-15 10:29 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-15 15:04 ` Het Gala
2023-05-12 14:32 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] migration: modified 'migrate' QAPI to accept 'channels' argument for migration Het Gala
2023-05-15 10:36 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-16 5:48 ` Het Gala
2023-05-16 8:57 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-16 10:14 ` Het Gala
2023-05-12 14:32 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] migration: modified 'migrate-incoming' " Het Gala
2023-05-15 10:01 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-15 10:38 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-12 14:32 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] migration: Introduced MigrateChannelList struct to migration code flow Het Gala
2023-05-15 10:04 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-15 10:42 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-16 17:18 ` Het Gala
2023-05-17 8:34 ` Juan Quintela [this message]
2023-05-16 10:32 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] migration: Modified 'migrate' and 'migrate-incoming' QAPI commands for migration Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ttwbfjb0.fsf@secure.mitica \
--to=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=aravind.retnakaran@nutanix.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=het.gala@nutanix.com \
--cc=manish.mishra@nutanix.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=prerna.saxena@nutanix.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).