From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: wrampazz@redhat.com, philmd@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wainersm@redhat.com>,
crosa@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs/devel: Explain how acceptance tests can be skipped
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:30:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87turjlrzz.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d79dad7f-ba62-a79a-3a51-394c8314935f@redhat.com>
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:
> On 13/01/2021 20.52, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote:
>> Documented under the "Acceptance tests using the Avocado Framework"
>> section in testing.rst how environment variables are used to skip tests.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wainersm@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> CI (success): https://gitlab.com/wainersm/qemu/-/pipelines/241249714
>>
>> docs/devel/testing.rst | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/docs/devel/testing.rst b/docs/devel/testing.rst
>> index 0aa7a13bba..3cdb458565 100644
>> --- a/docs/devel/testing.rst
>> +++ b/docs/devel/testing.rst
>> @@ -871,6 +871,68 @@ qemu_bin
>>
>> The exact QEMU binary to be used on QEMUMachine.
>>
>> +Skipping tests
>> +--------------
>> +The Avocado framework provides Python decorators which allow for easily skip
>> +tests running under certain conditions. For example, on the lack of a binary
>> +on the test system or when the running environment is an CI system. For further
>
> s/is an CI/is a CI/
>
>> +information about those decorators, please refer to::
>> +
>> + https://avocado-framework.readthedocs.io/en/latest/guides/writer/chapters/writing.html#skipping-tests
>> +
>> +While the conditions for skipping tests are often specifics of each one, there
>> +are recurring scenarios identified by the QEMU developers and the use of
>> +environment variables became a kind of standard way to enable/disable tests.
>> +
>> +It follows a not comprehensive list of those variables.
>
> s/It follows a/Here is a/ ?
There now follows a non-comprehensive list of those variables:
?
I'm not sure if that is idiomatic international English or just British
English - it's usually a phrase that precedes our party political
broadcasts on TV ;-)
>
>> +AVOCADO_ALLOW_LARGE_STORAGE
>> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> +Tests which are going to fetch or produce assets considered *large* are not
>> +going to run unless that `AVOCADO_ALLOW_LARGE_STORAGE=1` is exported on
>> +the environment.
>> +
>> +The definition of *large* is a bit arbitrary here, but it usually means an
>> +asset which occupies at least 1GB of size on disk when uncompressed.
>> +
>> +AVOCADO_ALLOW_UNTRUSTED_CODE
>> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> +There are tests which will boot a kernel image or firmware that can be
>> +considered not safe to run on the developer's workstation, thus they are
>> +skipped by default. The definition of *not safe* is also arbitrary but
>> +usually it means a blob which either its source or build process aren't
>> +public available.
>> +
>> +You should export `AVOCADO_ALLOW_UNTRUSTED_CODE=1` on the environment in
>> +order to allow tests which make use of those assets to get running.
>
> maybe better: "... which make use of those kind of assets." ?
>
>> +AVOCADO_TIMEOUT_EXPECTED
>> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> +The Avocado framework has a timeout mechanism which interrupt tests to avoid the
>
> s/interrupt/interrupts/
>
>> +test suite of getting stuck. The timeout value can be set via test parameter or
>> +property defined in the test class, for further details::
>> +
>> + https://avocado-framework.readthedocs.io/en/latest/guides/writer/chapters/writing.html#setting-a-test-timeout
>> +
>> +Even though the timeout can be set by the test developer, there are some tests
>> +that may not have a well-defined limit of time to finish under certain
>> +conditions. For example, tests that take longer to execute when QEMU is
>> +compiled with debug flags. Therefore, the `AVOCADO_TIMEOUT_EXPECTED` variable
>> +has been used to determine whether those tests should run or not.
>> +
>> +GITLAB_CI
>> +~~~~~~~~~
>> +A number of tests are flagged to not run on the GitLab CI. Usually because
>> +they proved to the flaky or there are constraints on the CI environment which
>> +would make them fail. If you encounter a similar situation then use that
>> +variable as shown on the code snippet below to skip the test:
>> +
>> +.. code::
>> +
>> + @skipIf(os.getenv('GITLAB_CI'), 'Running on GitLab')
>> + def test(self):
>> + do_something()
>> +
>> Uninstalling Avocado
>> --------------------
>>
>
> Thomas
--
Alex Bennée
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-14 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-13 19:52 [PATCH] docs/devel: Explain how acceptance tests can be skipped Wainer dos Santos Moschetta
2021-01-14 8:22 ` Thomas Huth
2021-01-14 10:30 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87turjlrzz.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
--cc=wrampazz@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).