From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59850) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dTNmr-0006Ex-Ga for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 03:34:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dTNmq-0002XI-SN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 03:34:49 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Llu=C3=ADs_Vilanova?= References: <149915701334.6295.1724301929524364123.stgit@frigg.lan> <149915849243.6295.4484103824675839071.stgit@frigg.lan> Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 09:34:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Eric Blake's message of "Wed, 5 Jul 2017 16:14:10 -0500") Message-ID: <87tw2og0ov.fsf@frigg.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 6/6] trace: [trivial] Statically enable all guest events List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Emilio G. Cota" , Eduardo Habkost , Stefan Hajnoczi , Michael Tokarev , Laurent Vivier , "open list:Trivial patches" Eric Blake writes: > On 07/04/2017 03:54 AM, Llu=C3=ADs Vilanova wrote: >> The existing optimizations makes it feasible to have them available on a= ll >> builds. > While this change may feel trivial, I think it is a misnomer to include > "[trivial]" in the subject line, and I also think it should not go in > through qemu-trivial. The ideal trivial patch is one that can be > applied in isolation, but your patch can only be applied as part of a > series that includes the earlier optimizations that made this one possibl= e. Ok. Does this mean I should send a new series without the trivial tag? Cheers, Lluis