qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
To: QEMU Developer <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	KVM devel mailing list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [repost] KVM call minutes for 2016-02-16
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:35:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87twkzako4.fsf@emacs.mitica> (raw)


Hi
[I mistyped qemu-devel@ address on first submission, sorry.]


Random ideas that I took for the talk, I hope that some of the active
participants can reply with a more coherent view.

State of the art (Andreas)
- Having very specific socket objects
- Dynamic allocation using new parameters
- Which level should we be doing the hotplug (granularity)
  x86-> socket level
  powerpc -> core
  z390 -> thread level

Christian
- Low level device adding
- Initialize from the beginning all cpu objects
  Hot-plugging would be to put them on-line
- how cpu came into being
- how are we going to add in x86 with device add
  * x86 and sparc -cpu handling is special case
  * not copy that on s390, better example in ARM?
- Way to handle this?
  * save the feature string internally, for reusing with new cpu
  * how best handle, it can depend of cpu model and board
  * how to make libvirt level not crazy?
  * should we hide the cpu add inside the machine implementation
  * having an array of empty sockets where to plug new cpus
  * only compatible types can be set on link property (not sure how well are enforced)
  * set the link property of the machine to the core object just created
  * powerpc cpu object is realized hook should check that it is done
    is a hot plug operation to automate this
  * powerpc only has cores and threads
  * we can have a property in the core object to know where it goes
  * if each core has two threads, when we add a new core, we always add 2 threads
  * cpu_add have a type={core,thread,whatever} what is the problem with it?
  * pre-created id's for cpu_add?
  * do different implementations and then try to find commonalities.
  * ARM can need to be able to add different cpu models
  * how to specify the topology
  * cpu_add has always thought to be an interim solution until we get the real one
  * problems with migration, specially with cpu_del
  * get cpu_add on x86
    * they don't support unplug
    * they don't support topology
  * realization matters about where we put the things, in child or parent object
  

Later, JUan.

                 reply	other threads:[~2016-02-23  8:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87twkzako4.fsf@emacs.mitica \
    --to=quintela@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).