From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42353) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YngIT-0004J6-Pw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:42:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YngIN-0003tC-Tc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:42:01 -0400 Received: from e28smtp06.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.6]:41559) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YngIN-0003sT-82 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:41:55 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp06.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 10:11:51 +0530 From: Nikunj A Dadhania In-Reply-To: <5540A00D.4080500@redhat.com> References: <1430204006-10160-1-git-send-email-nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1430204006-10160-2-git-send-email-nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150428133029.3494542e@thh440s> <20150429015638.GC32589@voom.redhat.com> <87sibjxsfo.fsf@abhimanyu.in.ibm.com> <5540975F.3090804@redhat.com> <87pp6nxq0x.fsf@abhimanyu.in.ibm.com> <5540A00D.4080500@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 10:11:46 +0530 Message-ID: <87twvy5it1.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [REBASE PATCH v5 1/2] machine: add default_ram_size to machine class List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , David Gibson , agraf@suse.de Cc: thuth@redhat.com, aik@ozlabs.ru, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com, imammedo@redhat.com Hi Paolo, Paolo Bonzini writes: > On 29/04/2015 11:06, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote: >> > so David can push both patches. >> > >> > But isn't 1G a bit too much? At least on x86 you can easily boot with 512M. >> >> I understood this number as not the _minimum memory_ to boot the >> VM. And this will only come in picture when the user has not specified >> any memory. > > This in turn will basically only happen for QEMU developers. So keeping > the default on the low side would make sense. > > On my (4G memory) laptop I might not even be able to boot a PPC64 VM > with 1G and TCG, but I can do that nicely with 256M. That will be fine with me as well, i.e. 256M David/Alex, Do you have comments on this before we change it? Regards Nikunj