From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34522) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VUc5i-0005Qp-Vo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 08:45:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VUc5Z-0001o1-BF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 08:45:14 -0400 Received: from e23smtp09.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.142]:51068) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VUc5Y-0001ev-AC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 08:45:05 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp09.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 22:44:35 +1000 From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" In-Reply-To: <1381494908-25933-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1381494908-25933-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 18:14:21 +0530 Message-ID: <87txgom0yi.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-ppc: Fix htab_mask calculation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: agraf@suse.de, paulus@samba.org Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org "Aneesh Kumar K.V" writes: > From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" > > Correctly update the htab_mask using the return value of > KVM_PPC_ALLOCATE_HTAB ioctl. Also we don't update sdr1 > on GET_SREGS for HV. So don't update htab_mask if sdr1 > is found to be zero. Fix the pte index calculation to be > same as that found in the kernel > > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V > --- > hw/ppc/spapr.c | 3 ++- > target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c | 2 +- > target-ppc/mmu_helper.c | 4 +++- > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c > index 4a23b6a..4ce069b 100644 > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c > @@ -717,7 +717,8 @@ static void spapr_cpu_reset(void *opaque) > > env->external_htab = (uint8_t *)spapr->htab; > env->htab_base = -1; > - env->htab_mask = HTAB_SIZE(spapr) - 1; > + /* 128 (2**7) bytes in each HPTEG */ > + env->htab_mask = (1ULL << ((spapr)->htab_shift - 7)) - 1; > env->spr[SPR_SDR1] = (target_ulong)(uintptr_t)spapr->htab | > (spapr->htab_shift - 18); > } > diff --git a/target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c b/target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c > index aeb4593..0deeae6 100644 > --- a/target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c > +++ b/target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c > @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ static hwaddr ppc_hash64_pteg_search(CPUPPCState *env, hwaddr hash, > unsigned long pte_index; > struct ppc_hash64_hpte_token *token; > > - pte_index = (hash * HPTES_PER_GROUP) & env->htab_mask; > + pte_index = (hash & env->htab_mask) * HPTES_PER_GROUP; > token = ppc_hash64_start_access(ppc_env_get_cpu(env), pte_index); > if (!token) { > return -1; > diff --git a/target-ppc/mmu_helper.c b/target-ppc/mmu_helper.c > index 04a840b..0322304 100644 > --- a/target-ppc/mmu_helper.c > +++ b/target-ppc/mmu_helper.c > @@ -2025,7 +2025,9 @@ void ppc_store_sdr1(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong value) > " stored in SDR1\n", htabsize); > htabsize = 28; > } > - env->htab_mask = (1ULL << (htabsize + 18)) - 1; > + if (htabsize) { > + env->htab_mask = (1ULL << (htabsize + 18)) - 1; This should also be ? env->htab_mask = (1ULL << (htabsize + 18 - 7)) - 1; > + } > env->htab_base = value & SDR_64_HTABORG; > } else > #endif /* defined(TARGET_PPC64) */ -aneesh