From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51706) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tm2an-0001NI-No for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:24:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tm2X4-0003wU-Mk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:21:35 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:8795) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tm2X4-0003tR-72 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:20:58 -0500 From: Juan Quintela In-Reply-To: <50D457C3.9040605@redhat.com> (Paolo Bonzini's message of "Fri, 21 Dec 2012 13:36:19 +0100") References: <1356044532-8511-1-git-send-email-quintela@redhat.com> <87ehikmeqj.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <87d2y4qj2t.fsf@elfo.mitica> <50D457C3.9040605@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:20:10 +0100 Message-ID: <87txrfpmnp.fsf@elfo.mitica> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/34] migration thread and queue Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 21/12/2012 02:39, Juan Quintela ha scritto: >>> I can't bisect tonight but can attempt to tomorrow. How has this been >>> tested? >> >> I have tested with tcp, load/not-load with guests form 4GB to 16GB RAM. >> Will test tomorrow with your test case. I didn't tested exec:, though. >> >>> >>> I'm a little concerned here about the timing. With the Christmas >>> and New Years holiday we're pretty darn close to soft freeze for 1.4. > > (To expand on my previous message, might as well declare soft freeze > today if that is the case). > >>> Has this series gone through a full autotest run with multiple guests? >> >> Will re-test tomorrow with autotest. > > You haven't integrated the fixes I sent you yesterday (attached and > placed at migration-thread-20121220-lite). I'm running autotest now. I didn't included them jsut to do the pull request with the patches already reviewed, was going to add them to next pull request (patches are "trivial" right). famous last words. Just including patches in a pull request not before is something Anthony don't like. Later, Juan.