qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
To: Anton Kuchin <antonkuchin@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
	"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	yc-core@yandex-team.ru, "Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	virtio-fs@redhat.com, "Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] vhost-user-fs: add property to allow migration
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 15:14:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v8k1itoy.fsf@secure.mitica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230216140003.1103681-2-antonkuchin@yandex-team.ru> (Anton Kuchin's message of "Thu, 16 Feb 2023 16:00:03 +0200")

Anton Kuchin <antonkuchin@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
> Now any vhost-user-fs device makes VM unmigratable, that also prevents
> qemu update without stopping the VM. In most cases that makes sense
> because qemu has no way to transfer FUSE session state.
>
> But it is good to have an option for orchestrator to tune this according to
> backend capabilities and migration configuration.
>
> This patch adds device property 'migration' that is 'none' by default
> to keep old behaviour but can be set to 'external' to explicitly allow
> migration with minimal virtio device state in migration stream if daemon
> has some way to sync FUSE state on src and dst without help from qemu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Kuchin <antonkuchin@yandex-team.ru>

Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>

The migration bits are correct.

And I can think a better way to explain that one device is migrated
externally.

If you have to respin:

> +static int vhost_user_fs_pre_save(void *opaque)
> +{
> +    VHostUserFS *fs = (VHostUserFS *)opaque;

This hack is useless.
I know that there are still lots of code that still have it.


Now remember that I have no clue about vhost-user-fs.

But this looks fishy
>  static const VMStateDescription vuf_vmstate = {
>      .name = "vhost-user-fs",
> -    .unmigratable = 1,
> +    .minimum_version_id = 0,
> +    .version_id = 0,
> +    .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
> +        VMSTATE_VIRTIO_DEVICE,
> +        VMSTATE_UINT8(migration_type, VHostUserFS),
> +        VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
> +    },
> +   .pre_save = vhost_user_fs_pre_save,
>  };
>  
>  static Property vuf_properties[] = {
> @@ -309,6 +337,10 @@ static Property vuf_properties[] = {
>      DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("num-request-queues", VHostUserFS,
>                         conf.num_request_queues, 1),
>      DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("queue-size", VHostUserFS, conf.queue_size, 128),
> +    DEFINE_PROP_UNSIGNED("migration", VHostUserFS, migration_type,
> +                         VHOST_USER_MIGRATION_TYPE_NONE,
> +                         qdev_prop_vhost_user_migration_type,
> +                         uint8_t),
>      DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),

We have four properties here (5 with the new migration one), and you
only migrate one.

This looks fishy, but I don't know if it makes sense.
If they _have_ to be configured the same on source and destination, I
would transfer them and check in post_load that the values are correct.

Later, Juan.



  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-16 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-16 14:00 [PATCH v2 0/1] virtio-fs: implement option for stateless migration Anton Kuchin
2023-02-16 14:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] vhost-user-fs: add property to allow migration Anton Kuchin
2023-02-16 14:14   ` Juan Quintela [this message]
2023-02-16 16:11     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-16 16:13       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-16 16:22         ` Juan Quintela
2023-02-16 23:33           ` Anton Kuchin
2023-02-16 23:39           ` Anton Kuchin
2023-02-16 16:17       ` Juan Quintela
2023-02-16 21:09   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-02-16 23:14     ` Anton Kuchin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87v8k1itoy.fsf@secure.mitica \
    --to=quintela@redhat.com \
    --cc=antonkuchin@yandex-team.ru \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
    --cc=yc-core@yandex-team.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).