Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] virtio: fix feature negotiation for ACCESS_PLATFORM

[Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Feb 07 2022, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 07 Feb 2022 14:41:58 +0100
> Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:

>> OTOH, the decision to make it mandatory is certainly sound, and covered
>> by the spec. As the driver must be prepared for the device failing to
>> accept FEATURES_OK, we can make it mandatory here -- we should just not
>> say that it is considered mandatory from a spec standpoint. The spec
>> allows to make it mandatory, and we make it mandatory in our
>> implementation.
>
> Right. Was never my intention to say that it is considered mandatory
> by the spec. I guess the spec considers it less optional than the
> run of the mill features.
>
> Should I change the first sentence to something like "Unlike most virtio
> features ACCESS_PATFORM is considered mandatory by QEMU, i.e. the driver
> must accept it if offered by the device."

If you do s/PATFORM/PLATFORM/ :), yes. That's a much shorter way of
expressing what I had been trying to argue in my reply :)