From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF92FC433DB for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 23:53:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6760964E6C for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 23:53:51 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6760964E6C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:35654 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9GLm-0004tJ-GT for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 18:53:50 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39210) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9EAL-00010W-HT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 16:33:55 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]:44309) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9EAJ-00021e-5y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 16:33:53 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id g6so5954583wrs.11 for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 13:33:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aD9xfsq10PxtBx/j0KaHMDd4rUf7FkiAgK3pGOSDjXs=; b=Vm669/ED+6DOfUpWTPEi3qycx+rSU7Q1lEjwGsuIEQxEjmJ6oWFC5Og1LtgOsmqrXa yalduZrXY0ptAgAev2OLtqKWNzlu/kzvHwQM7x0jChTwSHK21i3/WxbsAkH8GyrXS3CC kVkip3+Bpb4eX62iQGeZsANjgHcn22JurHKke3bSuEGpgswXx6SsorKgOUHboInT9zzn aw6KmKrQ4o5n1galmEI/q+D+OBFi22aTEEkZ89NSfFHPWUOap2KcMI454NxnkX61a5Ir au4OfnIx6NQkBjvabJOAkH+GAHAsVJ60/IeeoSyNwFpfajxRubKf67GDtvgfm9Axz7On CASg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:date :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aD9xfsq10PxtBx/j0KaHMDd4rUf7FkiAgK3pGOSDjXs=; b=Yz6cUM/rrjAXG0i3QmqUmaKfHzrU8lYq5ND4p+8d6Z2GJn0Wfm/GQ3ranrD9uW4GLE SCrTJeDfCTSLw9zxZXxESvDAWflKJEHzuQ0NXAf1kqXg46d3sEfkUsHuSdUakSMWBDr9 g3dlkS6OxMoxC58joAJwcr6NxbOVf+M/bwSFhbqCWUWBpeqCPFfX7KwBPUvQFp5i4xoV PaCLQEHZ/wxXa05QfFF0uhFE5LTRaJi/nzGfGP+5W8BUJfdJ6b27FC7bsH5SBum7AwEZ 7YcgMsA6t3N7Of/hl+hTeLky9HHIySysbHRg2XK/csPRycbDNEgI8FAfCLaqPxcicTnV csHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Rqle2v9qGVxz5xQkDFOcjWu9AwlMIFQvTbvsMd+D6QldgbISE rGSYkbu6uorJnrZOVcJEf6twuw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz7shjYwraP5TO0HiYv9bPodayQ0iPjpP4LcjPQlVS8YntwVbfv1FU8ZSoyl+WXiAzwVzcpbg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e642:: with SMTP id b2mr22048278wrn.221.1612820029386; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 13:33:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from zen.linaroharston ([51.148.130.216]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n193sm816420wmb.0.2021.02.08.13.33.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 08 Feb 2021 13:33:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from zen (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zen.linaroharston (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC911FF7E; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 21:33:47 +0000 (GMT) References: <20210205164459.432714-1-stefanha@redhat.com> <20210208092723.GA18298@stefanha-x1.localdomain> User-agent: mu4e 1.5.7; emacs 28.0.50 From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= To: Jag Raman Subject: Re: [PULL v3 00/27] Block patches Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:29:11 +0000 In-reply-to: Message-ID: <87v9b29rd0.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42e; envelope-from=alex.bennee@linaro.org; helo=mail-wr1-x42e.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Elena Ufimtseva , John Johnson , Thomas Huth , =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9?= , Qemu-block , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "Denis V. Lunev" , QEMU Developers , Wainer dos Santos Moschetta , Stefan Hajnoczi , Igor Mammedov , Paolo Bonzini , Fam Zheng , Peter Maydell , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Eduardo Habkost Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Jag Raman writes: >> On Feb 8, 2021, at 5:02 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 wrote: >>=20 >> On 2/8/21 10:27 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >>> On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 05:03:20PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: >>>> On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 at 22:53, Peter Maydell = wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 at 16:45, Stefan Hajnoczi wr= ote: >>>=20 >>> Hi Elena and Jag, >>> Please take a look at this QOM failure. I guess remote-pcihost is being >>> built but pcie-host-bridge is missing from the s390x-softmmu target. > > Hi All, > > Thank you for letting us know about this build issue! We are working on r= esolving it. > > We would like to ensure that the next version we send doesn=E2=80=99t cau= se too many > problems like this. Should the Travis/GitLab CI have caught this problem? > > We ran the following tests before sending the patches out for review: > - =E2=80=9Cmake docker=E2=80=9D On it's own it won't do much. You could go with: make docker-test-build@debian-s390-cross You can't run make check for most cross builds but you can at least run the builds themselves: make docker-test-build should run the test build on all capable images. docker-all-tests should be all possible tests. > - Travis CI (will use GitLab going forward) > - Tests in the =E2=80=9Ctests/acceptance=E2=80=9D folder. > > Is there any other tests we could run before sending the next > revision? Manually running: make check-block=20 > > Thank you very much! --=20 Alex Benn=C3=A9e