From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Pavel Dovgalyuk <dovgaluk@ispras.ru>
Cc: wrampazz@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Pavel Dovgalyuk <Pavel.Dovgaluk@gmail.com>,
pavel.dovgaluk@ispras.ru, crosa@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
philmd@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] tests/acceptance: add kernel record/replay test for x86_64
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 10:20:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v9kf2j2g.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9906fce-55fd-1fe2-0a9b-ff5d8d91c0fa@ispras.ru>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1794 bytes --]
Pavel Dovgalyuk <dovgaluk@ispras.ru> writes:
> On 28.05.2020 16:26, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Pavel Dovgalyuk <dovgaluk@ispras.ru> writes:
>>
>>> On 27.05.2020 18:41, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>>> Pavel Dovgalyuk <Pavel.Dovgaluk@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> This patch adds a test for record/replay an execution of x86_64 machine.
>>>>> Execution scenario includes simple kernel boot, which allows testing
>>>>> basic hardware interaction in RR mode.
<snip>
>>>> This test fails for me on the replay:
>>> Have you applied latest RR patches?
>> I have the following on top of the acceptance patches:
>>
>> a36c23042fe * review/record-replay-acceptance-v2 icount: fix shift=auto for record/replay
>> 4ab2164c10b * replay: synchronize on every virtual timer callback
>> 66104ce6e4b * replay: notify the main loop when there are no instructions
>>
> Please also try adding "replay: implement fair mutex"
OK that was enough to get the pc_i440fx to pass:
JOB ID : 33f94542f1f2d1e98c8dad820f66ec5ea9bd9fc1
JOB LOG : /home/alex/avocado/job-results/job-2020-05-29T09.36-33f9454/job.log
(1/2) ./tests/acceptance/replay_linux.py:ReplayLinuxX8664.test_pc_i440fx: PASS (502.55 s)
(2/2) ./tests/acceptance/replay_linux.py:ReplayLinuxX8664.test_pc_q35: INTERRUPTED: Test died without reporting the status.\nRunner error occurred: Timeout reached\nOriginal status: ERROR\n{'name': '2-./tests/acceptance/replay_linux.py:ReplayLinuxX8664.test_pc_q35', 'logdir': '/home/alex/avocado/job-results/job-2020-05-29T09.36-33f9454/test... (1811.23 s)
RESULTS : PASS 1 | ERROR 0 | FAIL 0 | SKIP 0 | WARN 0 | INTERRUPT 1 | CANCEL 0
JOB TIME : 2313.96 s
I've attached the log although it's a bit messy because the console
seems to have stripped out any newlines.
[-- Attachment #2: log file of failure --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 585179 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 23 bytes --]
--
Alex Bennée
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-29 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-27 10:30 [PATCH v2 00/11] Record/replay acceptance tests Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] tests/acceptance: allow console interaction with specific VMs Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 14:20 ` Alex Bennée
2020-05-27 14:42 ` Willian Rampazzo
2020-05-27 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] tests/acceptance: refactor boot_linux_console test to allow code reuse Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 14:31 ` Alex Bennée
2020-05-27 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] tests/acceptance: add base class record/replay kernel tests Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 14:41 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-27 15:20 ` Alex Bennée
2020-05-28 7:19 ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-28 8:28 ` Alex Bennée
2020-05-29 5:58 ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 10:31 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] tests/acceptance: add kernel record/replay test for x86_64 Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 14:53 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-28 7:12 ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-28 8:38 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-28 11:07 ` Alex Bennée
2020-05-28 11:32 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-27 15:40 ` Alex Bennée
2020-05-27 16:20 ` Alex Bennée
2020-05-28 7:26 ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 15:41 ` Alex Bennée
2020-05-28 6:12 ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-28 13:26 ` Alex Bennée
2020-05-29 5:56 ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-29 9:20 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2020-05-27 10:31 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] tests/acceptance: add record/replay test for aarch64 Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 14:44 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-27 10:31 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] tests/acceptance: add record/replay test for arm Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 10:31 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] tests/acceptance: add record/replay test for ppc64 Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 10:31 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] tests/acceptance: add record/replay test for m68k Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 10:31 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] tests/acceptance: record/replay tests with advcal images Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 10:31 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] tests/acceptance: refactor boot_linux to allow code reuse Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 10:31 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] tests/acceptance: Linux boot test for record/replay Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 16:44 ` Alex Bennée
2020-05-28 6:17 ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-05-27 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] Record/replay acceptance tests no-reply
2020-05-27 14:53 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v9kf2j2g.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=Pavel.Dovgaluk@gmail.com \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=dovgaluk@ispras.ru \
--cc=pavel.dovgaluk@ispras.ru \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wrampazz@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).