qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
	"Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>,
	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	lvivier@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	peterx@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] tests: Make acpid test compile
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 13:37:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87val55ls3.fsf@secure.mitica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170830104554.GD18526@redhat.com> (Daniel P. Berrange's message of "Wed, 30 Aug 2017 11:45:54 +0100")

"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 03:17:25PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 08/28/2017 09:41 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> > On 08/23/2017 01:53 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>> >> * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote:
>> >>> Compiler gets confused with the size of the struct, so move form
>> >>> g_new0() to g_malloc0().
>> >>>
>> >>> I *think* that the problem is in gcc (or glib for that matter), but
>> >>> the documentation of the g_new0 states that 1sts first argument is an
>> >>> struct type, and uint32_t is not an struct type.
>> >>>
>> >>> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
>> >>> ---
>> 
>> >>>  
>> >>>      /* get the addresses of the tables pointed by rsdt */
>> >>> -    tables = g_new0(uint32_t, tables_nr);
>> >>> +    tables = g_malloc0(sizeof(uint32_t) * tables_nr);
>> >>
>> 
>> > I fixed that one with :
>> > 
>> > @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static uint32_t acpi_find_vgia(void)
>> >      AcpiRsdpDescriptor rsdp_table;
>> >      uint32_t rsdt;
>> >      AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1 rsdt_table;
>> > -    int tables_nr;
>> > +    uint32_t tables_nr;
>> 
>> I like this one better (multiplication in g_malloc0() makes me worry
>> about overflow; using unsigned math to avoid the problem is nicer).  Are
>> we going to see a v2 of this patch series?
>
> It should really be size_t, because it is assigned from the result of
> a size_t calculation, but you then also need to change a later assert
> which was relying on it being signed:
>
> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static uint32_t acpi_find_vgia(void)
>      AcpiRsdpDescriptor rsdp_table;
>      uint32_t rsdt;
>      AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1 rsdt_table;
> -    int tables_nr;
> +    size_t tables_nr;

I was using this already.

>      uint32_t *tables;
>      AcpiTableHeader ssdt_table;
>      VgidTable vgid_table;
> @@ -62,9 +62,9 @@ static uint32_t acpi_find_vgia(void)
>      ACPI_ASSERT_CMP(rsdt_table.signature, "RSDT");
>  
>      /* compute the table entries in rsdt */
> +    g_assert_cmpint(rsdt_table.length, >, sizeof(AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1));
>      tables_nr = (rsdt_table.length - sizeof(AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1)) /
>                  sizeof(uint32_t);
> -    g_assert_cmpint(tables_nr, >, 0);
>  
>      /* get the addresses of the tables pointed by rsdt */
>      tables = g_new0(uint32_t, tables_nr);
>

And here we are, this mail arrived after I sent my new series.  Will
wait for more comments and resend later.

Thanks, Juan.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-30 11:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-23  8:38 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Fix tests on recent gcc Juan Quintela
2017-08-23  8:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tests: Use real size for iov tests Juan Quintela
2017-08-23 11:18   ` Peter Xu
2017-08-23 11:35     ` Juan Quintela
2017-08-28 16:10   ` Thomas Huth
2017-08-30  9:45     ` Juan Quintela
2017-08-30 11:34     ` Juan Quintela
2017-08-23  8:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] tests: Make acpid test compile Juan Quintela
2017-08-23 11:53   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-08-28 14:41     ` Cédric Le Goater
2017-08-29 20:17       ` Eric Blake
2017-08-30 10:45         ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-08-30 11:37           ` Juan Quintela [this message]
2017-08-30 10:51       ` Juan Quintela
2017-08-30 11:07         ` Daniel P. Berrange

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87val55ls3.fsf@secure.mitica \
    --to=quintela@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=clg@kaod.org \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).