* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] mttcg/i386: Patch instruction using async_safe_* framework
@ 2017-02-23 1:20 Pranith Kumar
2017-02-23 10:50 ` Alex Bennée
2017-02-23 22:38 ` Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pranith Kumar @ 2017-02-23 1:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: qemu-devel, Richard Henderson, Peter Maydell, Alex Bennée
In mttcg, calling pause_all_vcpus() during execution from the
generated TBs causes a deadlock if some vCPU is waiting for exclusive
execution in start_exclusive(). Fix this by using the aync_safe_*
framework instead of pausing vcpus for patching instructions.
CC: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
CC: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
CC: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
---
hw/i386/kvmvapic.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c b/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c
index 82a4955..15eb39d 100644
--- a/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c
+++ b/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c
@@ -383,8 +383,7 @@ static void patch_byte(X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong addr, uint8_t byte)
cpu_memory_rw_debug(CPU(cpu), addr, &byte, 1, 1);
}
-static void patch_call(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip,
- uint32_t target)
+static void patch_call(X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip, uint32_t target)
{
uint32_t offset;
@@ -393,17 +392,74 @@ static void patch_call(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip,
cpu_memory_rw_debug(CPU(cpu), ip + 1, (void *)&offset, sizeof(offset), 1);
}
-static void patch_instruction(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip)
+struct PatchInfo {
+ VAPICHandlers *handler;
+ target_ulong ip;
+};
+
+static void do_patch_instruction(CPUState *cs, run_on_cpu_data data)
{
- CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
- CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
- VAPICHandlers *handlers;
+ X86CPU *x86_cpu = X86_CPU(cs);
+ CPUX86State *env = &x86_cpu->env;
+ struct PatchInfo *info = (struct PatchInfo *) data.host_ptr;
+ VAPICHandlers *handlers = info->handler;
+ target_ulong ip = info->ip;
uint8_t opcode[2];
uint32_t imm32 = 0;
target_ulong current_pc = 0;
target_ulong current_cs_base = 0;
uint32_t current_flags = 0;
+ cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(env, ¤t_pc, ¤t_cs_base,
+ ¤t_flags);
+ /* Account this instruction, because we will exit the tb.
+ This is the first instruction in the block. Therefore
+ there is no need in restoring CPU state. */
+ if (use_icount) {
+ --cs->icount_decr.u16.low;
+ }
+
+ cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip, opcode, sizeof(opcode), 0);
+
+ switch (opcode[0]) {
+ case 0x89: /* mov r32 to r/m32 */
+ patch_byte(x86_cpu, ip, 0x50 + modrm_reg(opcode[1])); /* push reg */
+ patch_call(x86_cpu, ip + 1, handlers->set_tpr);
+ break;
+ case 0x8b: /* mov r/m32 to r32 */
+ patch_byte(x86_cpu, ip, 0x90);
+ patch_call(x86_cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr[modrm_reg(opcode[1])]);
+ break;
+ case 0xa1: /* mov abs to eax */
+ patch_call(x86_cpu, ip, handlers->get_tpr[0]);
+ break;
+ case 0xa3: /* mov eax to abs */
+ patch_call(x86_cpu, ip, handlers->set_tpr_eax);
+ break;
+ case 0xc7: /* mov imm32, r/m32 (c7/0) */
+ patch_byte(x86_cpu, ip, 0x68); /* push imm32 */
+ cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip + 6, (void *)&imm32, sizeof(imm32), 0);
+ cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip + 1, (void *)&imm32, sizeof(imm32), 1);
+ patch_call(x86_cpu, ip + 5, handlers->set_tpr);
+ break;
+ case 0xff: /* push r/m32 */
+ patch_byte(x86_cpu, ip, 0x50); /* push eax */
+ patch_call(x86_cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr_stack);
+ break;
+ default:
+ abort();
+ }
+
+ g_free(info);
+}
+
+static void patch_instruction(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip)
+{
+ CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
+ VAPICHandlers *handlers;
+ uint8_t opcode[2];
+ uint32_t imm32 = 0;
+
if (smp_cpus == 1) {
handlers = &s->rom_state.up;
} else {
@@ -411,14 +467,14 @@ static void patch_instruction(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip)
}
if (!kvm_enabled()) {
- cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(env, ¤t_pc, ¤t_cs_base,
- ¤t_flags);
- /* Account this instruction, because we will exit the tb.
- This is the first instruction in the block. Therefore
- there is no need in restoring CPU state. */
- if (use_icount) {
- --cs->icount_decr.u16.low;
- }
+ struct PatchInfo *info = g_new(struct PatchInfo, 1);
+ const run_on_cpu_func fn = do_patch_instruction;
+ info->handler = handlers;
+ info->ip = ip;
+
+ async_safe_run_on_cpu(cs, fn, RUN_ON_CPU_HOST_PTR(info));
+ cs->exception_index = EXCP_INTERRUPT;
+ cpu_loop_exit(cs);
}
pause_all_vcpus();
@@ -428,41 +484,33 @@ static void patch_instruction(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip)
switch (opcode[0]) {
case 0x89: /* mov r32 to r/m32 */
patch_byte(cpu, ip, 0x50 + modrm_reg(opcode[1])); /* push reg */
- patch_call(s, cpu, ip + 1, handlers->set_tpr);
+ patch_call(cpu, ip + 1, handlers->set_tpr);
break;
case 0x8b: /* mov r/m32 to r32 */
patch_byte(cpu, ip, 0x90);
- patch_call(s, cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr[modrm_reg(opcode[1])]);
+ patch_call(cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr[modrm_reg(opcode[1])]);
break;
case 0xa1: /* mov abs to eax */
- patch_call(s, cpu, ip, handlers->get_tpr[0]);
+ patch_call(cpu, ip, handlers->get_tpr[0]);
break;
case 0xa3: /* mov eax to abs */
- patch_call(s, cpu, ip, handlers->set_tpr_eax);
+ patch_call(cpu, ip, handlers->set_tpr_eax);
break;
case 0xc7: /* mov imm32, r/m32 (c7/0) */
patch_byte(cpu, ip, 0x68); /* push imm32 */
cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip + 6, (void *)&imm32, sizeof(imm32), 0);
cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip + 1, (void *)&imm32, sizeof(imm32), 1);
- patch_call(s, cpu, ip + 5, handlers->set_tpr);
+ patch_call(cpu, ip + 5, handlers->set_tpr);
break;
case 0xff: /* push r/m32 */
patch_byte(cpu, ip, 0x50); /* push eax */
- patch_call(s, cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr_stack);
+ patch_call(cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr_stack);
break;
default:
abort();
}
resume_all_vcpus();
-
- if (!kvm_enabled()) {
- /* Both tb_lock and iothread_mutex will be reset when
- * longjmps back into the cpu_exec loop. */
- tb_lock();
- tb_gen_code(cs, current_pc, current_cs_base, current_flags, 1);
- cpu_loop_exit_noexc(cs);
- }
}
void vapic_report_tpr_access(DeviceState *dev, CPUState *cs, target_ulong ip,
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] mttcg/i386: Patch instruction using async_safe_* framework
2017-02-23 1:20 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] mttcg/i386: Patch instruction using async_safe_* framework Pranith Kumar
@ 2017-02-23 10:50 ` Alex Bennée
2017-02-23 22:38 ` Richard Henderson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alex Bennée @ 2017-02-23 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pranith Kumar; +Cc: qemu-devel, Richard Henderson, Peter Maydell
Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com> writes:
> In mttcg, calling pause_all_vcpus() during execution from the
> generated TBs causes a deadlock if some vCPU is waiting for exclusive
> execution in start_exclusive(). Fix this by using the aync_safe_*
> framework instead of pausing vcpus for patching instructions.
>
> CC: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
> CC: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> CC: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
> ---
> hw/i386/kvmvapic.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c b/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c
> index 82a4955..15eb39d 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c
> @@ -383,8 +383,7 @@ static void patch_byte(X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong addr, uint8_t byte)
> cpu_memory_rw_debug(CPU(cpu), addr, &byte, 1, 1);
> }
>
> -static void patch_call(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip,
> - uint32_t target)
> +static void patch_call(X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip, uint32_t target)
> {
> uint32_t offset;
>
> @@ -393,17 +392,74 @@ static void patch_call(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip,
> cpu_memory_rw_debug(CPU(cpu), ip + 1, (void *)&offset, sizeof(offset), 1);
> }
>
> -static void patch_instruction(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip)
> +struct PatchInfo {
> + VAPICHandlers *handler;
> + target_ulong ip;
> +};
> +
> +static void do_patch_instruction(CPUState *cs, run_on_cpu_data data)
> {
> - CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
> - CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
> - VAPICHandlers *handlers;
> + X86CPU *x86_cpu = X86_CPU(cs);
> + CPUX86State *env = &x86_cpu->env;
> + struct PatchInfo *info = (struct PatchInfo *) data.host_ptr;
> + VAPICHandlers *handlers = info->handler;
> + target_ulong ip = info->ip;
> uint8_t opcode[2];
> uint32_t imm32 = 0;
> target_ulong current_pc = 0;
> target_ulong current_cs_base = 0;
> uint32_t current_flags = 0;
>
> + cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(env, ¤t_pc, ¤t_cs_base,
> + ¤t_flags);
> + /* Account this instruction, because we will exit the tb.
> + This is the first instruction in the block. Therefore
> + there is no need in restoring CPU state. */
> + if (use_icount) {
> + --cs->icount_decr.u16.low;
> + }
> +
> + cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip, opcode, sizeof(opcode), 0);
> +
> + switch (opcode[0]) {
> + case 0x89: /* mov r32 to r/m32 */
> + patch_byte(x86_cpu, ip, 0x50 + modrm_reg(opcode[1])); /* push reg */
> + patch_call(x86_cpu, ip + 1, handlers->set_tpr);
> + break;
> + case 0x8b: /* mov r/m32 to r32 */
> + patch_byte(x86_cpu, ip, 0x90);
> + patch_call(x86_cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr[modrm_reg(opcode[1])]);
> + break;
> + case 0xa1: /* mov abs to eax */
> + patch_call(x86_cpu, ip, handlers->get_tpr[0]);
> + break;
> + case 0xa3: /* mov eax to abs */
> + patch_call(x86_cpu, ip, handlers->set_tpr_eax);
> + break;
> + case 0xc7: /* mov imm32, r/m32 (c7/0) */
> + patch_byte(x86_cpu, ip, 0x68); /* push imm32 */
> + cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip + 6, (void *)&imm32, sizeof(imm32), 0);
> + cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip + 1, (void *)&imm32, sizeof(imm32), 1);
> + patch_call(x86_cpu, ip + 5, handlers->set_tpr);
> + break;
> + case 0xff: /* push r/m32 */
> + patch_byte(x86_cpu, ip, 0x50); /* push eax */
> + patch_call(x86_cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr_stack);
> + break;
> + default:
> + abort();
> + }
> +
> + g_free(info);
> +}
> +
> +static void patch_instruction(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip)
> +{
> + CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
> + VAPICHandlers *handlers;
> + uint8_t opcode[2];
> + uint32_t imm32 = 0;
> +
> if (smp_cpus == 1) {
> handlers = &s->rom_state.up;
> } else {
> @@ -411,14 +467,14 @@ static void patch_instruction(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip)
> }
>
> if (!kvm_enabled()) {
> - cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(env, ¤t_pc, ¤t_cs_base,
> - ¤t_flags);
> - /* Account this instruction, because we will exit the tb.
> - This is the first instruction in the block. Therefore
> - there is no need in restoring CPU state. */
> - if (use_icount) {
> - --cs->icount_decr.u16.low;
> - }
> + struct PatchInfo *info = g_new(struct PatchInfo, 1);
> + const run_on_cpu_func fn = do_patch_instruction;
> + info->handler = handlers;
> + info->ip = ip;
> +
> + async_safe_run_on_cpu(cs, fn, RUN_ON_CPU_HOST_PTR(info));
> + cs->exception_index = EXCP_INTERRUPT;
> + cpu_loop_exit(cs);
So my only concern is has the path we've taken here ensured that all
registers have been updated before we leave the loop. That said we
previously called cpu_loop_exit_noexc() which has the lovely comment:
void cpu_loop_exit_noexc(CPUState *cpu)
{
/* XXX: restore cpu registers saved in host registers */
But the offloading of this work to async is the right approach.
> }
>
> pause_all_vcpus();
> @@ -428,41 +484,33 @@ static void patch_instruction(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip)
> switch (opcode[0]) {
> case 0x89: /* mov r32 to r/m32 */
> patch_byte(cpu, ip, 0x50 + modrm_reg(opcode[1])); /* push reg */
> - patch_call(s, cpu, ip + 1, handlers->set_tpr);
> + patch_call(cpu, ip + 1, handlers->set_tpr);
> break;
> case 0x8b: /* mov r/m32 to r32 */
> patch_byte(cpu, ip, 0x90);
> - patch_call(s, cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr[modrm_reg(opcode[1])]);
> + patch_call(cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr[modrm_reg(opcode[1])]);
> break;
> case 0xa1: /* mov abs to eax */
> - patch_call(s, cpu, ip, handlers->get_tpr[0]);
> + patch_call(cpu, ip, handlers->get_tpr[0]);
> break;
> case 0xa3: /* mov eax to abs */
> - patch_call(s, cpu, ip, handlers->set_tpr_eax);
> + patch_call(cpu, ip, handlers->set_tpr_eax);
> break;
> case 0xc7: /* mov imm32, r/m32 (c7/0) */
> patch_byte(cpu, ip, 0x68); /* push imm32 */
> cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip + 6, (void *)&imm32, sizeof(imm32), 0);
> cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip + 1, (void *)&imm32, sizeof(imm32), 1);
> - patch_call(s, cpu, ip + 5, handlers->set_tpr);
> + patch_call(cpu, ip + 5, handlers->set_tpr);
> break;
> case 0xff: /* push r/m32 */
> patch_byte(cpu, ip, 0x50); /* push eax */
> - patch_call(s, cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr_stack);
> + patch_call(cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr_stack);
> break;
> default:
> abort();
> }
>
> resume_all_vcpus();
> -
> - if (!kvm_enabled()) {
> - /* Both tb_lock and iothread_mutex will be reset when
> - * longjmps back into the cpu_exec loop. */
> - tb_lock();
> - tb_gen_code(cs, current_pc, current_cs_base, current_flags, 1);
> - cpu_loop_exit_noexc(cs);
> - }
> }
>
> void vapic_report_tpr_access(DeviceState *dev, CPUState *cs, target_ulong ip,
--
Alex Bennée
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] mttcg/i386: Patch instruction using async_safe_* framework
2017-02-23 1:20 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] mttcg/i386: Patch instruction using async_safe_* framework Pranith Kumar
2017-02-23 10:50 ` Alex Bennée
@ 2017-02-23 22:38 ` Richard Henderson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2017-02-23 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pranith Kumar; +Cc: Peter Maydell, Alex Bennée, qemu-devel
On 02/23/2017 12:20 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> In mttcg, calling pause_all_vcpus() during execution from the
> generated TBs causes a deadlock if some vCPU is waiting for exclusive
> execution in start_exclusive(). Fix this by using the aync_safe_*
> framework instead of pausing vcpus for patching instructions.
>
> CC: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
> CC: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> CC: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
> ---
> hw/i386/kvmvapic.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c b/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c
> index 82a4955..15eb39d 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c
> @@ -383,8 +383,7 @@ static void patch_byte(X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong addr, uint8_t byte)
> cpu_memory_rw_debug(CPU(cpu), addr, &byte, 1, 1);
> }
>
> -static void patch_call(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip,
> - uint32_t target)
> +static void patch_call(X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip, uint32_t target)
> {
> uint32_t offset;
>
> @@ -393,17 +392,74 @@ static void patch_call(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip,
> cpu_memory_rw_debug(CPU(cpu), ip + 1, (void *)&offset, sizeof(offset), 1);
> }
>
> -static void patch_instruction(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip)
> +struct PatchInfo {
> + VAPICHandlers *handler;
> + target_ulong ip;
> +};
> +
> +static void do_patch_instruction(CPUState *cs, run_on_cpu_data data)
> {
> - CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
> - CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
> - VAPICHandlers *handlers;
> + X86CPU *x86_cpu = X86_CPU(cs);
> + CPUX86State *env = &x86_cpu->env;
> + struct PatchInfo *info = (struct PatchInfo *) data.host_ptr;
> + VAPICHandlers *handlers = info->handler;
> + target_ulong ip = info->ip;
> uint8_t opcode[2];
> uint32_t imm32 = 0;
> target_ulong current_pc = 0;
> target_ulong current_cs_base = 0;
> uint32_t current_flags = 0;
>
> + cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(env, ¤t_pc, ¤t_cs_base,
> + ¤t_flags);
> + /* Account this instruction, because we will exit the tb.
> + This is the first instruction in the block. Therefore
> + there is no need in restoring CPU state. */
> + if (use_icount) {
> + --cs->icount_decr.u16.low;
> + }
> +
> + cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip, opcode, sizeof(opcode), 0);
> +
> + switch (opcode[0]) {
> + case 0x89: /* mov r32 to r/m32 */
> + patch_byte(x86_cpu, ip, 0x50 + modrm_reg(opcode[1])); /* push reg */
> + patch_call(x86_cpu, ip + 1, handlers->set_tpr);
> + break;
> + case 0x8b: /* mov r/m32 to r32 */
> + patch_byte(x86_cpu, ip, 0x90);
> + patch_call(x86_cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr[modrm_reg(opcode[1])]);
> + break;
> + case 0xa1: /* mov abs to eax */
> + patch_call(x86_cpu, ip, handlers->get_tpr[0]);
> + break;
> + case 0xa3: /* mov eax to abs */
> + patch_call(x86_cpu, ip, handlers->set_tpr_eax);
> + break;
> + case 0xc7: /* mov imm32, r/m32 (c7/0) */
> + patch_byte(x86_cpu, ip, 0x68); /* push imm32 */
> + cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip + 6, (void *)&imm32, sizeof(imm32), 0);
> + cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip + 1, (void *)&imm32, sizeof(imm32), 1);
> + patch_call(x86_cpu, ip + 5, handlers->set_tpr);
> + break;
> + case 0xff: /* push r/m32 */
> + patch_byte(x86_cpu, ip, 0x50); /* push eax */
> + patch_call(x86_cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr_stack);
> + break;
> + default:
> + abort();
> + }
> +
> + g_free(info);
> +}
> +
> +static void patch_instruction(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip)
> +{
> + CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
> + VAPICHandlers *handlers;
> + uint8_t opcode[2];
> + uint32_t imm32 = 0;
> +
> if (smp_cpus == 1) {
> handlers = &s->rom_state.up;
> } else {
> @@ -411,14 +467,14 @@ static void patch_instruction(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip)
> }
>
> if (!kvm_enabled()) {
> - cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(env, ¤t_pc, ¤t_cs_base,
> - ¤t_flags);
> - /* Account this instruction, because we will exit the tb.
> - This is the first instruction in the block. Therefore
> - there is no need in restoring CPU state. */
> - if (use_icount) {
> - --cs->icount_decr.u16.low;
> - }
> + struct PatchInfo *info = g_new(struct PatchInfo, 1);
> + const run_on_cpu_func fn = do_patch_instruction;
> + info->handler = handlers;
> + info->ip = ip;
> +
> + async_safe_run_on_cpu(cs, fn, RUN_ON_CPU_HOST_PTR(info));
> + cs->exception_index = EXCP_INTERRUPT;
> + cpu_loop_exit(cs);
> }
>
> pause_all_vcpus();
> @@ -428,41 +484,33 @@ static void patch_instruction(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip)
> switch (opcode[0]) {
> case 0x89: /* mov r32 to r/m32 */
> patch_byte(cpu, ip, 0x50 + modrm_reg(opcode[1])); /* push reg */
> - patch_call(s, cpu, ip + 1, handlers->set_tpr);
> + patch_call(cpu, ip + 1, handlers->set_tpr);
> break;
> case 0x8b: /* mov r/m32 to r32 */
> patch_byte(cpu, ip, 0x90);
> - patch_call(s, cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr[modrm_reg(opcode[1])]);
> + patch_call(cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr[modrm_reg(opcode[1])]);
> break;
> case 0xa1: /* mov abs to eax */
> - patch_call(s, cpu, ip, handlers->get_tpr[0]);
> + patch_call(cpu, ip, handlers->get_tpr[0]);
> break;
> case 0xa3: /* mov eax to abs */
> - patch_call(s, cpu, ip, handlers->set_tpr_eax);
> + patch_call(cpu, ip, handlers->set_tpr_eax);
> break;
> case 0xc7: /* mov imm32, r/m32 (c7/0) */
> patch_byte(cpu, ip, 0x68); /* push imm32 */
> cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip + 6, (void *)&imm32, sizeof(imm32), 0);
> cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip + 1, (void *)&imm32, sizeof(imm32), 1);
> - patch_call(s, cpu, ip + 5, handlers->set_tpr);
> + patch_call(cpu, ip + 5, handlers->set_tpr);
> break;
> case 0xff: /* push r/m32 */
> patch_byte(cpu, ip, 0x50); /* push eax */
> - patch_call(s, cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr_stack);
> + patch_call(cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr_stack);
> break;
> default:
> abort();
> }
It appears as if we wind up with two copies of this patching code.
Please rearrange your new do_patch_instruction so that's not necessary.
r~
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] mttcg/i386: Patch instruction using async_safe_* framework
@ 2017-02-28 5:28 Pranith Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pranith Kumar @ 2017-02-28 5:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin, Paolo Bonzini, Richard Henderson,
Eduardo Habkost, open list:All patches CC here
Cc: Peter Maydell
In mttcg, calling pause_all_vcpus() during execution from the
generated TBs causes a deadlock if some vCPU is waiting for exclusive
execution in start_exclusive(). Fix this by using the aync_safe_*
framework instead of pausing vcpus for patching instructions.
CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
CC: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
---
hw/i386/kvmvapic.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c b/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c
index 82a49556af..11b0d494eb 100644
--- a/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c
+++ b/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c
@@ -383,8 +383,7 @@ static void patch_byte(X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong addr, uint8_t byte)
cpu_memory_rw_debug(CPU(cpu), addr, &byte, 1, 1);
}
-static void patch_call(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip,
- uint32_t target)
+static void patch_call(X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip, uint32_t target)
{
uint32_t offset;
@@ -393,23 +392,24 @@ static void patch_call(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip,
cpu_memory_rw_debug(CPU(cpu), ip + 1, (void *)&offset, sizeof(offset), 1);
}
-static void patch_instruction(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip)
+struct PatchInfo {
+ VAPICHandlers *handler;
+ target_ulong ip;
+};
+
+static void do_patch_instruction(CPUState *cs, run_on_cpu_data data)
{
- CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
- CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
- VAPICHandlers *handlers;
+ X86CPU *x86_cpu = X86_CPU(cs);
+ CPUX86State *env = &x86_cpu->env;
+ struct PatchInfo *info = (struct PatchInfo *) data.host_ptr;
+ VAPICHandlers *handlers = info->handler;
+ target_ulong ip = info->ip;
uint8_t opcode[2];
uint32_t imm32 = 0;
target_ulong current_pc = 0;
target_ulong current_cs_base = 0;
uint32_t current_flags = 0;
- if (smp_cpus == 1) {
- handlers = &s->rom_state.up;
- } else {
- handlers = &s->rom_state.mp;
- }
-
if (!kvm_enabled()) {
cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(env, ¤t_pc, ¤t_cs_base,
¤t_flags);
@@ -421,48 +421,70 @@ static void patch_instruction(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip)
}
}
- pause_all_vcpus();
-
cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip, opcode, sizeof(opcode), 0);
switch (opcode[0]) {
case 0x89: /* mov r32 to r/m32 */
- patch_byte(cpu, ip, 0x50 + modrm_reg(opcode[1])); /* push reg */
- patch_call(s, cpu, ip + 1, handlers->set_tpr);
+ patch_byte(x86_cpu, ip, 0x50 + modrm_reg(opcode[1])); /* push reg */
+ patch_call(x86_cpu, ip + 1, handlers->set_tpr);
break;
case 0x8b: /* mov r/m32 to r32 */
- patch_byte(cpu, ip, 0x90);
- patch_call(s, cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr[modrm_reg(opcode[1])]);
+ patch_byte(x86_cpu, ip, 0x90);
+ patch_call(x86_cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr[modrm_reg(opcode[1])]);
break;
case 0xa1: /* mov abs to eax */
- patch_call(s, cpu, ip, handlers->get_tpr[0]);
+ patch_call(x86_cpu, ip, handlers->get_tpr[0]);
break;
case 0xa3: /* mov eax to abs */
- patch_call(s, cpu, ip, handlers->set_tpr_eax);
+ patch_call(x86_cpu, ip, handlers->set_tpr_eax);
break;
case 0xc7: /* mov imm32, r/m32 (c7/0) */
- patch_byte(cpu, ip, 0x68); /* push imm32 */
+ patch_byte(x86_cpu, ip, 0x68); /* push imm32 */
cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip + 6, (void *)&imm32, sizeof(imm32), 0);
cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip + 1, (void *)&imm32, sizeof(imm32), 1);
- patch_call(s, cpu, ip + 5, handlers->set_tpr);
+ patch_call(x86_cpu, ip + 5, handlers->set_tpr);
break;
case 0xff: /* push r/m32 */
- patch_byte(cpu, ip, 0x50); /* push eax */
- patch_call(s, cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr_stack);
+ patch_byte(x86_cpu, ip, 0x50); /* push eax */
+ patch_call(x86_cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr_stack);
break;
default:
abort();
}
- resume_all_vcpus();
+ g_free(info);
+}
+
+static void patch_instruction(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip)
+{
+ CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
+ VAPICHandlers *handlers;
+ struct PatchInfo *info;
+
+ if (smp_cpus == 1) {
+ handlers = &s->rom_state.up;
+ } else {
+ handlers = &s->rom_state.mp;
+ }
+
+ info = g_new(struct PatchInfo, 1);
+ info->handler = handlers;
+ info->ip = ip;
if (!kvm_enabled()) {
- /* Both tb_lock and iothread_mutex will be reset when
- * longjmps back into the cpu_exec loop. */
- tb_lock();
- tb_gen_code(cs, current_pc, current_cs_base, current_flags, 1);
- cpu_loop_exit_noexc(cs);
+ const run_on_cpu_func fn = do_patch_instruction;
+
+ async_safe_run_on_cpu(cs, fn, RUN_ON_CPU_HOST_PTR(info));
+ cs->exception_index = EXCP_INTERRUPT;
+ cpu_loop_exit(cs);
}
+
+ pause_all_vcpus();
+
+ do_patch_instruction(cs, RUN_ON_CPU_HOST_PTR(info));
+
+ resume_all_vcpus();
+ g_free(info);
}
void vapic_report_tpr_access(DeviceState *dev, CPUState *cs, target_ulong ip,
--
2.11.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-28 5:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-23 1:20 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] mttcg/i386: Patch instruction using async_safe_* framework Pranith Kumar
2017-02-23 10:50 ` Alex Bennée
2017-02-23 22:38 ` Richard Henderson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-02-28 5:28 Pranith Kumar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).