qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Using PCI config space to indicate config location
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:36:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vceiih4j.fsf@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zk3v6npm.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>

Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> writes:

> Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> writes:
>> So how about this:
>>
>> (1) Add a vendor specific pci capability for new-style virtio.
>>     Specifies the pci bar used for new-style virtio registers.
>>     Guests can use it to figure whenever new-style virtio is
>>     supported and to map the correct bar (which will probably
>>     be bar 1 in most cases).
>
> This was closer to the original proposal[1], which I really liked (you
> can layout bars however you want).  Anthony thought that vendor
> capabilities were a PCI-e feature, but it seems they're blessed in PCI
> 2.3.

2.3 was standardized in 2002.  Are we confident that vendor extensions
play nice with pre-2.3 OSes like Win2k, WinXP, etc?

I still think it's a bad idea to rely on something so "new" in something
as fundamental as virtio-pci unless we have to.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
> So let's return to that proposal, giving something like this:
>
> /* IDs for different capabilities.  Must all exist. */
> /* FIXME: Do we win from separating ISR, NOTIFY and COMMON? */
> /* Common configuration */
> #define VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_COMMON_CFG	1
> /* Notifications */
> #define VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_NOTIFY_CFG	2
> /* ISR access */
> #define VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_ISR_CFG		3
> /* Device specific confiuration */
> #define VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_DEVICE_CFG	4
>
> /* This is the PCI capability header: */
> struct virtio_pci_cap {
> 	u8 cap_vndr;	/* Generic PCI field: PCI_CAP_ID_VNDR */
> 	u8 cap_next;	/* Generic PCI field: next ptr. */
> 	u8 cap_len;	/* Generic PCI field: sizeof(struct virtio_pci_cap). */
> 	u8 cfg_type;	/* One of the VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_*_CFG. */
> 	u8 bar;		/* Where to find it. */
> 	u8 unused;
> 	__le16 offset;	/* Offset within bar. */
> 	__le32 length;	/* Length. */
> };
>
> This means qemu can point the isr_cfg into the legacy area if it wants.
> In fact, it can put everything in BAR0 if it wants.
>
> Thoughts?
> Rusty.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-10 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-27  0:29 [Qemu-devel] Proposal for virtio standardization Rusty Russell
2012-10-04 18:49 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-08  2:21   ` [Qemu-devel] Using PCI config space to indicate config location Rusty Russell
2012-10-08 13:58     ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-08 14:58       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2012-10-08 15:09         ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-08 20:13           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2012-10-08 20:55             ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-08 23:56               ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-09  1:51                 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-09  3:16                   ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-09 10:17                     ` Avi Kivity
2012-10-09 14:03                       ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-09 13:56                     ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-10  3:44                       ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-10 11:37                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-10-09 21:09                     ` Jamie Lokier
2012-10-10  3:44                       ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-11  0:08                         ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-09  6:33                   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2012-10-09 15:26                     ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-09 20:24                       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2012-10-10  2:54                         ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-10 13:36                           ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2012-10-10 13:41                             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-10-11  0:43                               ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-10  8:34                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-10-10  8:30     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-10-11  1:18       ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-11 10:23         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-10-11 22:29           ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-12  9:33             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-10-12  9:51               ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-12 10:02                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-10-16 13:15                   ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-16 13:30                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-10-16 13:52                       ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-09 14:02 ` [Qemu-devel] Proposal for virtio standardization Cornelia Huck
2012-10-10  3:46   ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87vceiih4j.fsf@codemonkey.ws \
    --to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).