From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MqsSK-00025s-Pa for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:50:12 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MqsSG-00024n-6U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:50:12 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42175 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MqsSG-00024k-4F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:50:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:65289) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MqsSF-0004kq-K9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:50:07 -0400 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8OHo5eD003666 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:50:06 -0400 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: show failing device name instead of silently exiting References: <1253704471-30740-1-git-send-email-amit.shah@redhat.com> <8763b97588.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org> <20090924035908.GA4584@amit-x200.redhat.com> <87my4kqxl8.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org> <20090924133144.GA19389@amit-x200.redhat.com> <87pr9gpglx.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org> <20090924153606.GA21338@amit-x200.redhat.com> From: Markus Armbruster Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:50:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20090924153606.GA21338@amit-x200.redhat.com> (Amit Shah's message of "Thu\, 24 Sep 2009 21\:06\:06 +0530") Message-ID: <87vdj8cjw3.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Amit Shah Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Amit Shah writes: > On (Thu) Sep 24 2009 [16:22:34], Markus Armbruster wrote: >> >> Thanks, and hope you don't mind me being such a stickler for clear >> commit messages. > > As long as you widen your net -- the commit logs aren't all too good to > read :-) It's an all too common complaint in my reviews. It stood out in your case not because the message was particularly bad, only because I couldn't find anything else to complain about :)