From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LUCld-0002f6-KB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:20:09 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LUClZ-0002eu-70 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:20:08 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47113 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LUClZ-0002er-23 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:20:05 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:44797 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LUClY-00049n-In for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:20:04 -0500 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LUClW-0006En-Co for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:20:02 +0000 Received: from 77.64.176.217 ([77.64.176.217]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:20:02 +0000 Received: from js by 77.64.176.217 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:20:02 +0000 From: Julian Stecklina Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 05:16:47 +0100 Message-ID: <87vdrsw3ww.fsf@tabernacle.localnet> References: <18752.17539.868644.941088@tabernacle.localnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: news Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Enable monitor commands in GDB stub Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Julian Stecklina writes: > Hello, > > I have added support for the qRcmd packet to the GDB stub. This lets > you issue "monitor foo" in GDB and have it executed in qemu's monitor. > > A quick test suggests that it works fine, but I am quite new to the > qemu codebase, so I don't know if calling 'monitor_handle_command' > directly from the GDB stub violates any assumptions. Any comments on the patch? I use it since I posted this patch in December without problems. Regards, -- Julian Stecklina Well, take it from an old hand: the only reason it would be easier to program in C is that you can't easily express complex problems in C, so you don't. - Erik Naggum (in comp.lang.lisp)