From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LNDrp-0004ax-SZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:05:41 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LNDro-0004Zt-Ev for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:05:41 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49548 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LNDro-0004Zo-93 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:05:40 -0500 Received: from lechat.rtp-net.org ([88.191.19.38]:48964) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LNDrn-0004p1-KY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:05:39 -0500 Received: from lechat.rtp-net.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lechat.rtp-net.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C1710077 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:16:26 +0100 (CET) From: Arnaud Patard (Rtp) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:16:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87vdshmt39.fsf@lechat.rtp-net.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: [Qemu-devel] Help debugging qemu linux-user Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, Theses days, I've been trying to play with qemu on mipsel on my freetime (mainly to play with mips assembly). Now, I'm able to run some busybox commands with busybox-static debs (for armel,mipsel,i386). Unfortunately, every time I tried to use non-static binaries (say some chroot or the binaries from the linux-user-test-0.3.tar.gz file), qemu is crashing. The code should not be so bad as it's working fine with the static binaries imho. So either the bug comes from my code or it comes from somewhere else in the qemu code. Can someone give me some advice on how to debug that ? Moreover, after looking at the mailing-list archive, it's not clear if someone managed to run non-static binaries with the previous patches for mips hosts. Can someone tell me if it worked ? I plan to send the patches against the svn for inclusion but I need to fix this bug, add support for the softmmu case and clean my code (it's ugly, contains #if 0 and other bad things) so don't ask for it please :) btw, are there some CodingStyle rules ? Thanks, Arnaud