From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374FAC433ED for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 13:43:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 924F46113D for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 13:43:25 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 924F46113D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:46090 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lU8Sq-0008PJ-Ls for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 09:43:24 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44068) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lU8Rh-0007vM-Ld for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 09:42:13 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]:36807) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lU8Rf-0001FU-Bi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 09:42:13 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id x15so8842133wrq.3 for ; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 06:42:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=azaRh+cDn1EU4lWZUQ+60LKBxD1sRiyU+2GUI5+HM4A=; b=OcP9PsYeSxQMHZpBDJL7k49v53cCUjmGDS/HGT0+EWNM4Lfwvs0IZ9fgZ7M0cQhwSO MBnGcti6NGY9koyND9QHm6NqdhcZudSm9cgGAqFe8MNPdpjHOmAPo/snWMYBAT1PhRuu RfhLN2511NpDB5oA5hsc8Oly7ycrFmlhhn+Q4PC+5LtWqtKGsokQIN6yvS5sLPstiffQ O4Ozv0OfOCo5WdeHLfF0ZvabdurVmivWlPJ5TQMydKP7FW6GLhH7HaCblu6N5HqWQCn8 KZGEXD4VCJGeq/8aIgfl7zWJo0yNP1+n3EOhNoSpbw9e1uW1ioyU3N54rzgfCsUXGKAi lkFQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:date :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=azaRh+cDn1EU4lWZUQ+60LKBxD1sRiyU+2GUI5+HM4A=; b=T44EJKwgJ+Evrm1qedS0i5qVFlsIVLWNeWLET0tmUjZd4NP7Oaf8JTA9mgaLgiP7oD 8vngdWKBU8zUl6RKgcjK9SvHUruybD1A5cLSAPRHFHSTFPJTzXvPyVKVezo37g3pw905 QNsP6pCWl2KEwpzGb/dvphSuUFTsK6h9A/ny9AVk1twLJUVGhHU/Xh3LCu8YR723i8jg BTXl4LsAXO1usZnkKBU5/RzQZOHY9IvACc8Wz9IdWQWOnhEdhwZMhBowuiUZOnLCVZVB b3JQvG5m1f+kpZGmxIBrFuV+G9gXdNQKYO1wALVTv0F6yOVbbBRvl5en/l4iJtu5uTks Ar9Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532V3RSGfQIuo33eEJiCYJUNko/bkF1insE1/ChQdkXvPGGwQGjm Ln88VcXE2H0IegiGomL7yoxYvg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwm9poLhPbTnSR1kogHpm4EYUKYXaOqWqMXmymSo/Qn7ePh27RbdTYp/80KaJppmIQC7rF3/w== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ee03:: with SMTP id y3mr4375240wrn.323.1617802929118; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 06:42:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zen.linaroharston ([51.148.130.216]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j30sm43347523wrj.62.2021.04.07.06.42.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 07 Apr 2021 06:42:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zen (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zen.linaroharston (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794091FF7E; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 14:42:07 +0100 (BST) References: <20210331150527.14857-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.5.11; emacs 28.0.50 From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= To: Kevin Wolf Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: Add a QEMU Code of Conduct and Conflict Resolution Policy document Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 14:35:46 +0100 In-reply-to: Message-ID: <87wnteus7k.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42d; envelope-from=alex.bennee@linaro.org; helo=mail-wr1-x42d.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, Thomas Huth , berrange@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, agraf@csgraf.de, stefanha@redhat.com, Paolo Bonzini , afaerber@suse.de Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Kevin Wolf writes: > Am 31.03.2021 um 17:05 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben: >> +respectful. Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include: >> + >> +* The use of sexualized language or imagery >> + >> +* Personal attacks >> + >> +* Trolling or insulting/derogatory comments >> + >> +* Public or private harassment >> + >> +* Publishing other's private information, such as physical or electronic >> +addresses, without explicit permission > > "Electronic addresses"? No more Cc: in emails without asking for > explicit permission first in each case, especially when looping in > people who are not subscribed to the list? And the same for attribution > in commits (turning informal statements into Reported-by, Acked-by > etc.)? Links to git repositories of other people? > > I'm sure that this is not what was intended, but it's pretty clearly the > implication of what is written here. I'm pretty sure emails used to post to public mailing lists (or used in a dco tag) are considered public pieces of information. I read the above as covering things that are not public such as private email addresses or chat ids and the likes. > (This kind of "bugs" is one of the reasons why I'm not a huge fan of > written rules instead of trusting the judgement of community leaders. > In the communities I am involved in, I can't remember many cases where > they actually helped to resolve conflicts, but I can remember many > unproductive discussions about how to interpret the written text and > what it does and doesn't cover.) Well we don't have to start here ;-) We explicitly try to avoid rules lawyering with the very next statement: This isn't an exhaustive list of things that you can't do. Rather, take it in the spirit in which it's intended: a guide to make it easier to be excellent to each other. --=20 Alex Benn=C3=A9e