From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38476) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1csZIQ-0000gE-SQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 14:23:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1csZIM-0003iG-TX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 14:23:14 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45262) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1csZIM-0003i7-NJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 14:23:10 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB821C00BB3A for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 18:23:09 +0000 (UTC) From: Markus Armbruster References: <1490621195-2228-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <1490621195-2228-3-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 20:23:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Max Reitz's message of "Mon, 27 Mar 2017 18:12:37 +0200") Message-ID: <87wpbaefzo.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v3 for-2.9 02/11] rbd: Fix to cleanly reject -drive without pool or image List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Max Reitz Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com, jdurgin@redhat.com, jcody@redhat.com Max Reitz writes: > On 27.03.2017 18:10, Max Reitz wrote: >> On 27.03.2017 15:26, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>> qemu_rbd_open() neglects to check pool and image are present. >>> Reproducer: >>> >>> $ qemu-system-x86_64 -nodefaults -drive if=none,driver=rbd,pool=p >>> Segmentation fault (core dumped) >>> $ qemu-system-x86_64 -nodefaults -drive if=none,driver=rbd,image=i >>> qemu-system-x86_64: -drive if=none,driver=rbd,image=i: error opening pool (null) >>> >>> Doesn't affect -drive with file=..., because qemu_rbd_parse_filename() >>> always sets both pool and image. >>> >>> Doesn't affect -blockdev, because pool and image are mandatory in the >>> QAPI schema. >>> >>> Fix by adding the missing checks. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster >>> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake >>> --- >>> block/rbd.c | 10 +++++++--- >>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> Reviewed-by: Max Reitz > > That said, don't we have a similar issue with qemu_rbd_create()? It too > doesn't check whether those options are given but I guess they're just > as mandatory. Looks like it. I'll try to stick a fix into v4. Thanks!