From: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 05/13] target-ppc: add modulo word operations
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:30:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wpke85l2.fsf@abhimanyu.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160722071229.GW15941@voom.fritz.box>
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> writes:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 12:24:55PM +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>> David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> writes:
>>
>> > [ Unknown signature status ]
>> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 10:59:18AM +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>> >> David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > [ Unknown signature status ]
>> >> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 10:35:09PM +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>> >> >> Adding following instructions:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> moduw: Modulo Unsigned Word
>> >> >> modsw: Modulo Signed Word
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> >> >
>> >> > As rth has already mentioned this many branches probably means this
>> >> > wants a helper.
>> >> >
>> >> >> ---
>> >> >> target-ppc/translate.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> >> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> diff --git a/target-ppc/translate.c b/target-ppc/translate.c
>> >> >> index d44f7af..487dd94 100644
>> >> >> --- a/target-ppc/translate.c
>> >> >> +++ b/target-ppc/translate.c
>> >> >> @@ -1178,6 +1178,52 @@ GEN_DIVE(divde, divde, 0);
>> >> >> GEN_DIVE(divdeo, divde, 1);
>> >> >> #endif
>> >> >>
>> >> >> +static inline void gen_op_arith_modw(DisasContext *ctx, TCGv ret, TCGv arg1,
>> >> >> + TCGv arg2, int sign)
>> >> >> +{
>> >> >> + TCGLabel *l1 = gen_new_label();
>> >> >> + TCGLabel *l2 = gen_new_label();
>> >> >> + TCGv_i32 t0 = tcg_temp_local_new_i32();
>> >> >> + TCGv_i32 t1 = tcg_temp_local_new_i32();
>> >> >> + TCGv_i32 t2 = tcg_temp_local_new_i32();
>> >> >> +
>> >> >> + tcg_gen_trunc_tl_i32(t0, arg1);
>> >> >> + tcg_gen_trunc_tl_i32(t1, arg2);
>> >> >> + tcg_gen_brcondi_i32(TCG_COND_EQ, t1, 0, l1);
>> >>
>> >> Result for:
>> >> <anything> % 0 and ...
>> >>
>> >> >> + if (sign) {
>> >> >> + TCGLabel *l3 = gen_new_label();
>> >> >> + tcg_gen_brcondi_i32(TCG_COND_NE, t1, -1, l3);
>> >> >> + tcg_gen_brcondi_i32(TCG_COND_EQ, t0, INT32_MIN, l1);
>> >> >> + gen_set_label(l3);
>> >> >
>> >> > It's not really clear to be what the logic above is doing.
>> >>
>> >> ... For signed case
>> >> 0x8000_0000 % -1
>> >>
>> >> Is undefined, addressing those cases.
>> >
>> > Do you mean the tcg operations have undefined results or that the ppc
>> > instructions have undefined results?
>>
>> TCG side, I haven't tried.
>>
>> > If the latter, then why do you care about those cases?
>>
>> Thats how divd is implemented as well, i didn't want to break that. I am
>> looking at doing both div and mod as helpers.
>>
>> >> >> + tcg_gen_rem_i32(t2, t0, t1);
>> >> >> + } else {
>> >> >> + tcg_gen_remu_i32(t2, t0, t1);
>> >> >> + }
>> >> >> + tcg_gen_br(l2);
>> >> >> + gen_set_label(l1);
>> >> >> + if (sign) {
>> >> >> + tcg_gen_sari_i32(t2, t0, 31);
>> >> >
>> >> > AFAICT this sets t2 to either 0 or -1 depending on the sign of t0,
>> >> > which seems like an odd thing to do.
>> >>
>> >> Extending the sign later ...
>> >
>> > Right, so after sign extension you have a 64-bit 0 or -1. Still not
>> > seeing what that 0 or -1 result is useful for.
>>
>> Oh ok, i got why you got confused. I am re-writing all of it though, but
>> for understanding:
>>
>> if (divisor == 0)
>> goto l1;
>>
>> if (signed) {
>> if (divisor == -1 && dividend == INT_MIN)
>> goto l1;
>> compute_signed_rem(t2, t0, t1);
>> } else {
>> compute_unsigned_rem(t2, t0, t1);
>> }
>> goto l2; /* jump to setting extending result and return */
>>
>> l1: /* in case of invalid input set values */
>> if (signed)
>> t2 = -1 or 0;
>> else
>> t2 = 0;
>
> Ok, so why do you ever need different result values in the case of
> invalid input? Why is always returning 0 not good enough?
Let me go through the spec, as divd does the same thing.
Regards
Nikunj
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-22 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-18 17:05 [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 00/13] POWER9 TCG enablements - part1 Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-18 17:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 01/13] target-ppc: Introduce Power9 family Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-18 17:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 02/13] target-ppc: Introduce POWER ISA 3.0 flag Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-18 17:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 03/13] target-ppc: adding addpcis instruction Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-21 7:53 ` Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-18 17:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 04/13] target-ppc: add cmprb instruction Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-18 17:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 05/13] target-ppc: add modulo word operations Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-22 4:51 ` David Gibson
2016-07-22 5:29 ` Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-22 6:09 ` David Gibson
2016-07-22 6:54 ` Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-22 7:12 ` David Gibson
2016-07-22 8:00 ` Nikunj A Dadhania [this message]
2016-07-18 17:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 06/13] target-ppc: add modulo dword operations Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-18 17:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 07/13] target-ppc: add cnttzd[.] instruction Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-21 6:28 ` Richard Henderson
2016-07-21 7:54 ` Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-18 17:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 08/13] target-ppc: add cnttzw[.] instruction Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-21 6:29 ` Richard Henderson
2016-07-21 7:54 ` Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-18 17:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 09/13] target-ppc: add cmpeqb instruction Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-18 17:12 ` Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-21 6:41 ` Richard Henderson
2016-07-21 8:02 ` Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-22 19:28 ` Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-23 1:17 ` Richard Henderson
2016-07-23 6:08 ` Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-23 16:01 ` Richard Henderson
2016-07-22 4:57 ` David Gibson
2016-07-18 17:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 10/13] target-ppc: add setb instruction Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-21 6:49 ` Richard Henderson
2016-07-22 4:59 ` David Gibson
2016-07-22 5:30 ` Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-18 17:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 11/13] target-ppc: add maddld instruction Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-21 6:54 ` Richard Henderson
2016-07-21 6:59 ` Richard Henderson
2016-07-18 17:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 12/13] target-ppc: add maddhd and maddhdu instruction Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-21 7:02 ` Richard Henderson
2016-07-18 17:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 13/13] target-ppc: introduce opc4 for Expanded Opcode Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-22 5:07 ` David Gibson
2016-07-22 5:35 ` Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-22 6:08 ` David Gibson
2016-07-22 6:58 ` Nikunj A Dadhania
2016-07-22 9:49 ` Bharata B Rao
2016-07-22 10:00 ` Nikunj A Dadhania
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wpke85l2.fsf@abhimanyu.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me \
--to=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).