From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49525) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tt2Sw-0002Sk-Az for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:41:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tt2Su-0001FE-Am for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:41:37 -0500 Received: from e9.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.139]:44005) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tt2Su-0001E3-6r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:41:36 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e9.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:41:31 -0500 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by d01dlp01.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3834538C8045 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:41:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r09KfR0g223080 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:41:27 -0500 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r09KeboE027043 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 13:40:38 -0700 From: Anthony Liguori In-Reply-To: <50EDACE6.7080706@redhat.com> References: <1355761490-10073-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <877gnovmgj.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <50ED3971.5030600@redhat.com> <20130109102238.GC30914@redhat.com> <50ED4C0C.5070109@redhat.com> <20130109110926.GA17317@redhat.com> <50ED50B7.4000907@redhat.com> <20130109121027.GA18244@redhat.com> <50EDACE6.7080706@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:40:23 -0600 Message-ID: <87wqvm5buw.fsf@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/15] qdev: make reset semantics more clear and consistent, reset qbuses under virtio devices List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= Paolo Bonzini writes: > Il 09/01/2013 13:10, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: >> OK you mean like this this? Completely untested - if you >> and Anthony think we need this change please let me know >> and I'll test and repost. >> >> --> >> >> pci: make secondary bus reset explicit >> >> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > > Yes, but this can only be done after looking at all PCI devices that > have buses below (of which the bridge is a special case). And Anthony > also metioned using a new method of PCIDevice instead of device_reset. Sorry, what's the bug here? Is this a reset bug with cold reset or with a form of warm reset? Regards, Anthony Liguori > > Paolo