From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists1p.gnu.org (lists1p.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EF77CD4855 for ; Tue, 12 May 2026 07:46:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wMhnm-0003EI-DD; Tue, 12 May 2026 03:45:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wMhnj-0003Dx-D1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 May 2026 03:45:11 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wMhnh-0005qf-Bw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 May 2026 03:45:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1778571907; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dxw+KC79cEhv7mq9KwE1xaDqZt0dlxWynsbKD1dkjqw=; b=MtyU1AKiEMElFR6v9MgIjpwaUjS6CEONBkIJ8djYCasiUoYs5i6JQnXqog7kbKmEs2zziK YqY0RxOvIle6lQakRlwX37FBRFYEezQHqs+4zT2fYhJQvZBl6uLOkOx1Yva7/8DHDUxkfe 2+xgBld70Rm0FPMXs8KTsS9LA0lIkPg= Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-548-E4kmV6DEMmeBdzp-WVXE7g-1; Tue, 12 May 2026 03:45:03 -0400 X-MC-Unique: E4kmV6DEMmeBdzp-WVXE7g-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: E4kmV6DEMmeBdzp-WVXE7g_1778571902 Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1EB4195608A; Tue, 12 May 2026 07:45:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (unknown [10.44.22.2]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81B201955D84; Tue, 12 May 2026 07:45:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2405B21E6A01; Tue, 12 May 2026 09:44:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Markus Armbruster To: Peter Xu Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)" Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Update RDMA migration entry with M: In-Reply-To: <20260511143026.1296485-1-peterx@redhat.com> (Peter Xu's message of "Mon, 11 May 2026 10:30:26 -0400") References: <20260511143026.1296485-1-peterx@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 09:44:59 +0200 Message-ID: <87y0hpysuc.fsf@pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -24 X-Spam_score: -2.5 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.445, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: qemu development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Peter Xu writes: > We wanted to remove RDMA migration once but that didn't go further. In > reality, with the help of Zhijian it's in Odd Fixes stage, even if we just > merged one new parameter for it, for performance improvements. > > Markus pointed out we'd better have at least one M: for it to match > anything that is not orphaned. > > Remove the X: for Migration entry for RDMA files, then it'll start to cover > RDMA migration again. Keep the separate entry so Zhijian can keep getting > copied, and copy the M:s over to say someone is collecting patches. > Logically these M:s aren't needed after removing X:, but make it clearer. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5326b854-fcea-4af6-a479-792888a94a4d@fujitsu.com > Cc: Zhijian Li (Fujitsu) > Cc: Markus Armbruster > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster