From: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, berrange@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com,
Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>, Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/16] tests/qtest/migration: Add a test for mapped-ram with passing of fds
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 09:33:48 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y16yiifn.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZnCOLGWajlKxtzfo@x1n>
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 03:57:31PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> Add a multifd test for mapped-ram with passing of fds into QEMU. This
>> is how libvirt will consume the feature.
>>
>> There are a couple of details to the fdset mechanism:
>>
>> - multifd needs two distinct file descriptors (not duplicated with
>> dup()) so it can enable O_DIRECT only on the channels that do
>> aligned IO. The dup() system call creates file descriptors that
>> share status flags, of which O_DIRECT is one.
>>
>> - the open() access mode flags used for the fds passed into QEMU need
>> to match the flags QEMU uses to open the file. Currently O_WRONLY
>> for src and O_RDONLY for dst.
>>
>> Note that fdset code goes under _WIN32 because fd passing is not
>> supported on Windows.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
>> ---
>> - dropped Peter's r-b
>>
>> - stopped removing the fdset at the end of the tests. The migration
>> code should always cleanup after itself.
>
> Ah, that looks also ok.
I made a mistake here. We still need to require that the management
layer explicitly removes the fds they added by calling qmp_remove_fd().
The reason I thought it was ok to not remove the fds was that after your
suggestion to use monitor_fdset_free_if_empty() in patch 7, I mistakenly
put monitor_fdset_free() instead. So the qmp_remove_fd() was not finding
any fdsets and I thought that was QEMU removing everything. Which is
silly, because the whole purpose of the patch is to not do that.
I think I'll just fix this in the migration tree. It's just a revert to
v2 of this patch and the correction to patch 7.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-21 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-17 18:57 [PATCH v3 00/16] migration/mapped-ram: Add direct-io support Fabiano Rosas
2024-06-17 18:57 ` [PATCH v3 01/16] migration: Drop reference to QIOChannel if file seeking fails Fabiano Rosas
2024-06-17 19:17 ` Peter Xu
2024-06-17 18:57 ` [PATCH v3 02/16] migration: Fix file migration with fdset Fabiano Rosas
2024-06-22 4:21 ` Michael Tokarev
2024-06-23 15:44 ` Peter Xu
2024-06-17 18:57 ` [PATCH v3 03/16] tests/qtest/migration: Fix file migration offset check Fabiano Rosas
2024-06-17 18:57 ` [PATCH v3 04/16] tests/qtest/migration: Add a precopy file test with fdset Fabiano Rosas
2024-06-17 18:57 ` [PATCH v3 05/16] monitor: Drop monitor_fdset_dup_fd_find/_remove() Fabiano Rosas
2024-06-17 18:57 ` [PATCH v3 06/16] monitor: Introduce monitor_fdset_*free Fabiano Rosas
2024-06-17 18:57 ` [PATCH v3 07/16] monitor: Stop removing non-duplicated fds Fabiano Rosas
2024-06-17 18:57 ` [PATCH v3 08/16] monitor: Simplify fdset and fd removal Fabiano Rosas
2024-06-17 18:57 ` [PATCH v3 09/16] monitor: Report errors from monitor_fdset_dup_fd_add Fabiano Rosas
2024-06-17 18:57 ` [PATCH v3 10/16] io: Stop using qemu_open_old in channel-file Fabiano Rosas
2024-06-17 18:57 ` [PATCH v3 11/16] migration: Add direct-io parameter Fabiano Rosas
2024-06-17 18:57 ` [PATCH v3 12/16] migration/multifd: Add direct-io support Fabiano Rosas
2024-06-17 19:19 ` Peter Xu
2024-06-17 18:57 ` [PATCH v3 13/16] tests/qtest/migration: Add tests for file migration with direct-io Fabiano Rosas
2024-06-17 18:57 ` [PATCH v3 14/16] monitor: fdset: Match against O_DIRECT Fabiano Rosas
2024-06-17 18:57 ` [PATCH v3 15/16] migration: Add documentation for fdset with multifd + file Fabiano Rosas
2024-06-17 18:57 ` [PATCH v3 16/16] tests/qtest/migration: Add a test for mapped-ram with passing of fds Fabiano Rosas
2024-06-17 19:27 ` Peter Xu
2024-06-21 12:33 ` Fabiano Rosas [this message]
2024-06-21 14:16 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y16yiifn.fsf@suse.de \
--to=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=cfontana@suse.de \
--cc=jfehlig@suse.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).