From: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] migration: Fix qmp_query_migrate mbps value
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 09:56:36 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y1beascb.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZdVlUsTDJA4hdNhg@x1n>
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 04:44:57PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> The QMP command query_migrate might see incorrect throughput numbers
>> if it runs after we've set the migration completion status but before
>> migration_calculate_complete() has updated s->total_time and s->mbps.
>>
>> The migration status would show COMPLETED, but the throughput value
>> would be the one from the last iteration and not the one from the
>> whole migration. This will usually be a larger value due to the time
>> period being smaller (one iteration).
>>
>> Move migration_calculate_complete() earlier so that the status
>> MIGRATION_STATUS_COMPLETED is only emitted after the final counters
>> update.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
>> ---
>> CI run: https://gitlab.com/farosas/qemu/-/pipelines/1182405776
>> ---
>> migration/migration.c | 10 ++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
>> index ab21de2cad..7486d59da0 100644
>> --- a/migration/migration.c
>> +++ b/migration/migration.c
>> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ static int migration_maybe_pause(MigrationState *s,
>> int new_state);
>> static void migrate_fd_cancel(MigrationState *s);
>> static bool close_return_path_on_source(MigrationState *s);
>> +static void migration_calculate_complete(MigrationState *s);
>>
>> static void migration_downtime_start(MigrationState *s)
>> {
>> @@ -2746,6 +2747,7 @@ static void migration_completion(MigrationState *s)
>> migrate_set_state(&s->state, MIGRATION_STATUS_ACTIVE,
>> MIGRATION_STATUS_COLO);
>> } else {
>> + migration_calculate_complete(s);
>> migrate_set_state(&s->state, current_active_state,
>> MIGRATION_STATUS_COMPLETED);
>> }
>> @@ -2784,6 +2786,7 @@ static void bg_migration_completion(MigrationState *s)
>> goto fail;
>> }
>>
>> + migration_calculate_complete(s);
>> migrate_set_state(&s->state, current_active_state,
>> MIGRATION_STATUS_COMPLETED);
>> return;
>> @@ -2993,12 +2996,15 @@ static void migration_calculate_complete(MigrationState *s)
>> int64_t end_time = qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_REALTIME);
>> int64_t transfer_time;
>>
>> + /* QMP could read from these concurrently */
>> + bql_lock();
>> migration_downtime_end(s);
>> s->total_time = end_time - s->start_time;
>> transfer_time = s->total_time - s->setup_time;
>> if (transfer_time) {
>> s->mbps = ((double) bytes * 8.0) / transfer_time / 1000;
>> }
>> + bql_unlock();
>
> The lock is not needed?
>
> AFAIU that was needed because of things like runstate_set() rather than
> setting of these fields.
>
Don't we need to keep the total_time and mbps update atomic? Otherwise
query-migrate might see (say) total_time=0 and mbps=<correct value> or
total_time=<correct value> and mbps=<previous value>.
Also, what orders s->mbps update before the s->state update? I'd say we
should probably hold the lock around the whole total_time,mbps,state
update.
I'm not entirely sure, what do you think?
> See migration_update_counters() where it also updates mbps without holding
> a lock.
Here it might be less important since it's the middle of the migration,
there will proabably be more than one query-migrate which would see the
correct values.
>
> Other than that it looks all good.
>
>> }
>>
>> static void update_iteration_initial_status(MigrationState *s)
>> @@ -3145,7 +3151,6 @@ static void migration_iteration_finish(MigrationState *s)
>> bql_lock();
>> switch (s->state) {
>> case MIGRATION_STATUS_COMPLETED:
>> - migration_calculate_complete(s);
>> runstate_set(RUN_STATE_POSTMIGRATE);
>> break;
>> case MIGRATION_STATUS_COLO:
>> @@ -3189,9 +3194,6 @@ static void bg_migration_iteration_finish(MigrationState *s)
>> bql_lock();
>> switch (s->state) {
>> case MIGRATION_STATUS_COMPLETED:
>> - migration_calculate_complete(s);
>> - break;
>> -
>> case MIGRATION_STATUS_ACTIVE:
>> case MIGRATION_STATUS_FAILED:
>> case MIGRATION_STATUS_CANCELLED:
>> --
>> 2.35.3
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-21 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-19 19:44 [PATCH] migration: Fix qmp_query_migrate mbps value Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-21 2:52 ` Peter Xu
2024-02-21 12:56 ` Fabiano Rosas [this message]
2024-02-22 9:40 ` Peter Xu
2024-02-22 13:29 ` Peter Xu
2024-02-22 13:49 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-23 0:08 ` Peter Xu
2024-02-23 12:39 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-26 1:44 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y1beascb.fsf@suse.de \
--to=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).