From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46333) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXnU9-00059k-GR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 06:45:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXnU5-0005RD-DM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 06:45:12 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]:38444) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXnU5-0005Qd-38 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 06:45:09 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id o80so6955608wme.1 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 03:45:08 -0700 (PDT) References: <1467392693-22715-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> <1467392693-22715-5-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= In-reply-to: <1467392693-22715-5-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 11:45:16 +0100 Message-ID: <87y443bn43.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 04/27] int128: Use __int128 if available List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, cota@braap.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, serge.fdrv@gmail.com Richard Henderson writes: > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson > --- > include/qemu/int128.h | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 134 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/qemu/int128.h b/include/qemu/int128.h > index 52aaf99..08f1db1 100644 > --- a/include/qemu/int128.h > +++ b/include/qemu/int128.h > @@ -1,6 +1,138 @@ > #ifndef INT128_H > #define INT128_H > > +#ifdef CONFIG_INT128 > + > +typedef __int128 Int128; > + > +static inline Int128 int128_make64(uint64_t a) > +{ > + return a; > +} > + > +static inline uint64_t int128_get64(Int128 a) > +{ > + uint64_t r = a; > + assert(r == a); > + return r; > +} > + > +static inline uint64_t int128_getlo(Int128 a) > +{ > + return a; > +} > + > +static inline int64_t int128_gethi(Int128 a) > +{ > + return a >> 64; > +} > + > +static inline Int128 int128_zero(void) > +{ > + return 0; > +} > + > +static inline Int128 int128_one(void) > +{ > + return 1; > +} > + > +static inline Int128 int128_2_64(void) > +{ > + return (Int128)1 << 64; > +} > + > +static inline Int128 int128_exts64(int64_t a) > +{ > + return a; > +} > + > +static inline Int128 int128_and(Int128 a, Int128 b) > +{ > + return a & b; > +} > + > +static inline Int128 int128_rshift(Int128 a, int n) > +{ > + return a >> n; > +} > + > +static inline Int128 int128_add(Int128 a, Int128 b) > +{ > + return a + b; > +} > + > +static inline Int128 int128_neg(Int128 a) > +{ > + return -a; > +} > + > +static inline Int128 int128_sub(Int128 a, Int128 b) > +{ > + return a - b; > +} > + > +static inline bool int128_nonneg(Int128 a) > +{ > + return a >= 0; > +} > + > +static inline bool int128_eq(Int128 a, Int128 b) > +{ > + return a == b; > +} > + > +static inline bool int128_ne(Int128 a, Int128 b) > +{ > + return a != b; > +} > + > +static inline bool int128_ge(Int128 a, Int128 b) > +{ > + return a >= b; > +} > + > +static inline bool int128_lt(Int128 a, Int128 b) > +{ > + return a < b; > +} > + > +static inline bool int128_le(Int128 a, Int128 b) > +{ > + return a <= b; > +} > + > +static inline bool int128_gt(Int128 a, Int128 b) > +{ > + return a > b; > +} > + > +static inline bool int128_nz(Int128 a) > +{ > + return a != 0; > +} > + > +static inline Int128 int128_min(Int128 a, Int128 b) > +{ > + return a < b ? a : b; > +} > + > +static inline Int128 int128_max(Int128 a, Int128 b) > +{ > + return a > b ? a : b; > +} > + > +static inline void int128_addto(Int128 *a, Int128 b) > +{ > + *a += b; > +} > + > +static inline void int128_subfrom(Int128 *a, Int128 b) > +{ > + *a -= b; > +} > + > +#else /* !CONFIG_INT128 */ > > typedef struct Int128 Int128; > > @@ -153,4 +285,5 @@ static inline void int128_subfrom(Int128 *a, Int128 b) > *a = int128_sub(*a, b); > } > > -#endif > +#endif /* CONFIG_INT128 */ > +#endif /* INT128_H */ This breaks the tests/test-int128.c compile. This is mainly because the test itself assumes details of the internals of the Int128 structure however the expand() function will also need fixing if using GCC __int128's. -- Alex Bennée