From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, ehabkost@redhat.com, gleb@redhat.com,
jan.kiszka@siemens.com, mtosatti@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
blauwirbel@gmail.com, avi@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2 v3] target-i386: refactor reset handling and move it into cpu.c
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:19:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y5ly9uox.fsf@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50199841.8020507@suse.de>
Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> writes:
> Am 01.08.2012 22:02, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>> Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> writes:
>>
>>> Am 01.08.2012 20:25, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>>> Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Am 01.08.2012 17:43, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>>>>> Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> v2:
>>>>>>> ommited moving of x86_cpu_realize() from cpu_x86_init() to pc_new_cpu(),
>>>>>>> to keep cpu_init implementation in -softmmu and -user targets the same
>>>>>>> in single place and maintanable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> v3:
>>>>>>> reuse cpu_is_bsp() rather than open code check if apicbase has BSP bit set
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> tree for testing:
>>>>>>> https://github.com/imammedo/qemu/tree/x86_reset_v3
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> comiple & run tested with x86_64-linux-user, x86_64-softmmu targets
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Igor Mammedov (2):
>>>>>>> target-i386: move cpu halted decision into x86_cpu_reset
>>>>>>> target-i386: move cpu_reset and reset callback to cpu.c
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Applied all. Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> So do you intend to refactor all machines accordingly or leave it
>>>>> inconsistent now?
>>>>
>>>> Are you asking me?
>>>>
>>>> No, I have no intention of touching any other machine. We're not going
>>>> to limit cleaning up target-i386 unless every other machine is cleaned
>>>> up too.
>>>>
>>>> Reset logic should live in the CPU. Seems like a no-brainer to me.
>>>
>>> Yes, I'm asking you, since you replied and applied the series without
>>> responding to my review comment on patch 2/2. You probably applied it
>>> locally before reading my comments but then I would still have expected
>>> a reply on how to proceed in light of those comments:
>>
>> No, I saw your comment, although I had already decided to apply it by
>> then.
>
> If you did read it then you forgot my Reviewed-by on 1/2. :(
Oh, sorry, I switched to a new patch apply script. Maybe it's not
working correctly. I'll look into it.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
> Andreas
>
> --
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
> GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-01 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-23 13:22 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2 v3] target-i386: refactor reset handling and move it into cpu.c Igor Mammedov
2012-07-23 13:22 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] target-i386: move cpu halted decision into x86_cpu_reset Igor Mammedov
2012-08-01 14:00 ` Andreas Färber
2012-08-02 10:11 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-07-23 13:22 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] target-i386: move cpu_reset and reset callback to cpu.c Igor Mammedov
2012-08-01 14:09 ` Andreas Färber
2012-08-01 8:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2 v3] target-i386: refactor reset handling and move it into cpu.c Gleb Natapov
2012-08-01 15:43 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-08-01 15:50 ` Andreas Färber
2012-08-01 18:25 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-08-01 19:35 ` Andreas Färber
2012-08-01 20:02 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-08-01 20:16 ` Andreas Färber
2012-08-01 20:47 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-08-01 21:25 ` Andreas Färber
2012-08-01 21:43 ` Peter Maydell
2012-08-01 22:15 ` Andreas Färber
2012-08-02 11:19 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-08-01 20:57 ` Andreas Färber
2012-08-01 21:19 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y5ly9uox.fsf@codemonkey.ws \
--to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).