From: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
devel@lists.libvirt.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] migration: Deprecate fd: for file migration
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:47:39 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zftcdn04.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zi_puGn7Y1ArcLCL@x1n>
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 10:14:08AM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> The fd: URI can currently trigger two different types of migration, a
>> TCP migration using sockets and a file migration using a plain
>> file. This is in conflict with the recently introduced (8.2) QMP
>> migrate API that takes structured data as JSON-like format. We cannot
>> keep the same backend for both types of migration because with the new
>> API the code is more tightly coupled to the type of transport. This
>> means a TCP migration must use the 'socket' transport and a file
>> migration must use the 'file' transport.
>>
>> If we keep allowing fd: when using a file, this creates an issue when
>> the user converts the old-style (fd:) to the new style ("transport":
>> "socket") invocation because the file descriptor in question has
>> previously been allowed to be either a plain file or a socket.
>>
>> To avoid creating too much confusion, we can simply deprecate the fd:
>> + file usage, which is thought to be rarely used currently and instead
>> establish a 1:1 correspondence between fd: URI and socket transport,
>> and file: URI and file transport.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
>> ---
>> docs/about/deprecated.rst | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
>> index 0fb5c82640..813f7996fe 100644
>> --- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst
>> +++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
>> @@ -464,3 +464,17 @@ both, older and future versions of QEMU.
>> The ``blacklist`` config file option has been renamed to ``block-rpcs``
>> (to be in sync with the renaming of the corresponding command line
>> option).
>> +
>> +Migration
>> +---------
>> +
>> +``fd:`` URI when used for file migration (since 9.1)
>> +''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
>> +
>> +The ``fd:`` URI can currently provide a file descriptor that
>> +references either a socket or a plain file. These are two different
>> +types of migration. In order to reduce ambiguity, the ``fd:`` URI
>> +usage of providing a file descriptor to a plain file has been
>> +deprecated in favor of explicitly using the ``file:`` URI with the
>> +file descriptor being passed as an ``fdset``. Refer to the ``add-fd``
>> +command documentation for details on the ``fdset`` usage.
>
> Wanna do some warn_report() when detected non-socket fds alongside? Looks
> like we previously do this for all deprecations.
Yes, good point.
>
> What's the plan when it's support removed? I'm imaginging that we sanity
> check fstat() + S_ISSOCK on the fd and fail otherwise? In that case we can
> have the code there, dump warn_report(), then switch to failing qmp migrate
> (and incoming side) later on?
Something along those lines. We currently use fd_is_socket():
bool fd_is_socket(int fd)
{
int optval;
socklen_t optlen = sizeof(optval);
return !getsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TYPE, &optval, &optlen);
}
I'm thinking of this in fd_start_outgoing_migation():
if (!fd_is_socket(fd)) {
warn_report("fd: migration to a file is deprecated."
" Use file: instead.");
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-29 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-26 13:14 [PATCH v2 0/6] migration removals & deprecations Fabiano Rosas
2024-04-26 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] migration: Remove 'skipped' field from MigrationStats Fabiano Rosas
2024-04-29 19:50 ` Peter Xu
2024-04-26 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] migration: Remove 'inc' option from migrate command Fabiano Rosas
2024-04-29 19:51 ` Peter Xu
2024-04-26 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] migration: Remove 'blk/-b' option from migrate commands Fabiano Rosas
2024-04-29 15:52 ` Peter Xu
2024-04-29 17:18 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-04-29 18:27 ` Peter Xu
2024-04-29 18:35 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-04-29 18:53 ` Peter Xu
2024-04-26 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] migration: Remove block migration Fabiano Rosas
2024-04-26 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] migration: Remove non-multifd compression Fabiano Rosas
2024-04-29 19:52 ` Peter Xu
2024-04-26 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] migration: Deprecate fd: for file migration Fabiano Rosas
2024-04-29 18:40 ` Peter Xu
2024-04-29 18:47 ` Fabiano Rosas [this message]
2024-04-29 19:07 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zftcdn04.fsf@suse.de \
--to=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=devel@lists.libvirt.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).