From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] tests/qtest: add support for callback to receive QMP events
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2023 14:14:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zg5js7lb.fsf@secure.mitica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230531132400.1129576-3-berrange@redhat.com> ("Daniel P. Berrangé"'s message of "Wed, 31 May 2023 14:23:53 +0100")
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> Currently code must call one of the qtest_qmp_event* functions to
> fetch events. These are only usable if the immediate caller knows
> the particular event they want to capture, and are only interested
> in one specific event type. Adding ability to register an event
> callback lets the caller capture a range of events over any period
> of time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
First of all, I *love* the idea of the patch, but ...
> static GHookList abrt_hooks;
> @@ -703,8 +705,14 @@ QDict *qtest_qmp_receive(QTestState *s)
> if (!qdict_get_try_str(response, "event")) {
> return response;
> }
> - /* Stash the event for a later consumption */
> - s->pending_events = g_list_append(s->pending_events, response);
> +
> + if (s->eventCB) {
> + s->eventCB(s, qdict_get_str(response, "event"),
> + response, s->eventData);
> + } else {
> + /* Stash the event for a later consumption */
> + s->pending_events = g_list_append(s->pending_events, response);
> + }
> }
s->eventCB returns a bool that you are not using. I think this part of
the code would be more usefule if:
if (!s->eventCB || !s->eventCB(s, qdict_get_str(response, "event"),
response, s->eventData)) {
/* Stash the event for a later consumption */
s->pending_events = g_list_append(s->pending_events, response);
}
So if we are not handling the event, we put it on the pending_events
list.
What do you think?
Later, Juan.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-01 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-31 13:23 [PATCH v3 0/9] tests/qtest: make migration-test massively faster Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-31 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] tests/qtest: add various qtest_qmp_assert_success() variants Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 9:23 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 12:48 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 12:04 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-01 12:20 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-01 12:51 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-31 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] tests/qtest: add support for callback to receive QMP events Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-31 14:57 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 12:14 ` Juan Quintela [this message]
2023-06-01 12:56 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-31 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] tests/qtest: get rid of 'qmp_command' helper in migration test Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 9:26 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 9:32 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 12:17 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-31 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] tests/qtest: get rid of some 'qtest_qmp' usage " Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 9:28 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 12:10 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-31 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] tests/qtest: switch to using event callbacks for STOP event Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 9:31 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 12:23 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-31 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] tests/qtest: replace wait_command() with qtest_qmp_assert_success Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 9:37 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 12:27 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-31 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] tests/qtest: capture RESUME events during migration Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 9:38 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 12:31 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-01 12:34 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 12:37 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-01 12:44 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-31 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] tests/qtest: make more migration pre-copy scenarios run non-live Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 9:47 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 12:33 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-01 12:38 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 16:09 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 16:17 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 16:26 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-01 15:30 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-01 15:39 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 15:53 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-01 15:55 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 16:17 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-01 16:35 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 16:59 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-01 22:58 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-01 22:55 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-31 13:24 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] tests/qtest: massively speed up migration-test Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 10:04 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 15:46 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-01 16:05 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 16:22 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-01 16:36 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 17:04 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-01 23:00 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-01 23:43 ` Peter Xu
2023-07-10 9:35 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-07-10 9:40 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zg5js7lb.fsf@secure.mitica \
--to=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=leobras@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).